Abstract

In the spring of 2000, following the completion of a Ph.D. specializing in rhetoric and composition, I taught my first literature course: a writing-intensive survey of African American literature. The course, open to all students, regardless of major, used both traditional literature assignments, such as close readings, and more rhetorical assignments that asked the students to “join a conversation” on issues such as gender relations and African American education. After years of teaching argument in rhetoric and composition courses, I was excited about bringing some of the methods that had proved successful in this environment to the literature curriculum: peer review, audience analysis, guidance through the writing process, intensive revision, writing conferences. These were elements of writing instruction that I felt had been missing from my own undergraduate study in English literature, and I was eager to share them with my students. I envisioned transforming the lower-level writing course in literature by guiding students through the writing process and encouraging them to think of their writing in terms of the impact it would have on specific readers. The result was a disaster. Strategies that had elicited thoughtful revision from my rhetoric students fell flat in the literature classroom. For instance, I had had wonderful success with a peer review technique developed by Barbara Sitko (1993) in which students read a peer’s paper aloud and paused at the end of every sentence to summarize the main point of the essay and to predict what would appear next. My composition students had found this

Journal
Pedagogy
Published
2003-10-01
DOI
10.1215/15314200-3-3-399
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Pedagogy
  3. Pedagogy
  4. Pedagogy
  5. Pedagogy
Show all 7 →
  1. Written Communication
  2. Argumentation

References (35) · 5 in this index

  1. Aristotle. 1991. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, trans. George A. Kennedy. New York: Oxford Univers…
  2. College English
  3. Boehrer, Bruce. 2002. “`Lycidas': The Pastoral Elegy As Same-Sex Epithalamium.” PMLA117: 222-36.
  4. Booth, Wayne C. 1998. “The Ethics of Teaching Literature.” College English61: 41-55.
  5. Corbett, Edward P. J. 1990. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. 3d ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Show all 35 →
  1. Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Universi…
  2. DuBois, W. E. B. 1982. “Of Our Spiritual Strivings.” In The Souls of Black Folk,43-53. New York: Penguin.
  3. Eldred, Janet Carey, and Peter Mortensen. 1992.“Reading Literacy Narratives.” College English54:512-39.
  4. Written Communication
  5. ———. 1991. “The Rhetoric of Literary Criticism.” In Textual Dynamics of the Professions:Historical and Contem…
  6. Gilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. 2000.The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Cent…
  7. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1989. The Yellow Wallpaper and Other Writings. New York: Bantam.
  8. Graff, Gerald. 2002. “The Problem Problem and Other Oddities of Academic Discourse.” Arts and Humanities in H…
  9. Grass, Sean C. 1996. “Nature's Perilous Variety in Rossetti's `Goblin Market.'” Nineteenth-Century Literature…
  10. Herrington, Anne J. 1988. “Teaching, Writing,and Learning: A Naturalistic Study of Writing in an Undergraduat…
  11. Infante, Dominic A. 1971. “The Influence of a Topical System on the Discovery of Argument.” Speech Monographs…
  12. Written Communication
  13. Kirch, Ann. 1996. “A Basic Writer's Topoi for Timed Essay Tests.” Journal of Basic Writing15: 112-24.
  14. Lanham, Richard A. 1991. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. 2d ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  15. MacDonald, Susan Peck. 1987. “Problem Definition in Academic Writing.” College English49: 315-31.
  16. ———. 1994. Professional Academic Writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Carbondale: Southern Illinois…
  17. Pullman, George L. 1994. “Rhetoric and Hermeneutics: Composition, Invention, and Literature.”JAC14:367-87.
  18. Ramage, John D., and John C. Bean. 1995.Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. 3d ed.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  19. Richards, I. A. 1929. Practical Criticism:A Study of Literary Judgment. New York: Harcourt,Brace.
  20. Richardson, Angelique. 2000. “The Eugenization of Love: Sarah Grand and the Morality of Genealogy.”Victorian …
  21. Rottenberg, Annette T. 2000. Elements of Argument: A Text and Reader. 6th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's.
  22. Pedagogy
  23. Scholes, Robert. 1985. Textual Power:Literary Theory and the Teaching of English. New Haven, Conn.:Yale Unive…
  24. ———. 1998. The Rise and Fall of English: Reconstructing English As a Discipline. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Unive…
  25. Sitko, Barbara. 1993. “Exploring Feedback:Writers Meet Readers.” In Hearing Ourselves Think: Cognitive Resear…
  26. Socolovsky, Maya. 2002. “The Homelessness of Immigrant American Ghosts: Hauntings and Photographic Narrative …
  27. Spellmeyer, Kurt. 1989. “A Common Ground: The Essay in the Academy.” College English51: 262-76.
  28. University of Louisville. 2000. On-line course catalog. Accessed atwww.louisville.edu/provost/undergrad/catalog.
  29. Written Communication
  30. ———. 2002b. “Critics,Classrooms, and Commonplaces: Literary Studies As a Disciplinary Discourse Community”. P…