Rhetorical Citizenship and the Science of Science Communication

Jeanne Fahnestock University of Maryland, College Park
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2020-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-019-09499-7
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Rhetorica
  2. Poroi
  3. Written Communication
Also cites 47 works outside this index ↓
  1. Allison, David B., Andrew W. Brown, Brandon J. George, and Kathryn A. Kaiser. 2016. Reproducibility: A traged…
    Nature  
  2. Baker, Monya, and Dan Penny. 2016. Is there a reproducibility crisis? Nature 533: 452–454.
    Nature  
  3. Begley, C.Glenn, and Lee M. Ellis. 2012. Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. N…
    Nature  
  4. Bem, Daryl. 2011. Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  5. Besley, John C., Anthony Dudo, and Martin Storksdieck. 2015. Scientists’ views about communication training. …
    Journal of research in science teaching  
  6. Besley, John C., Anthony D. Dudo, Shupei Yuan, and Niveen Abi Ghannam. 2016. Qualitative interviews with scie…
    Science Communication  
  7. Bohannon, John. 2013. Who’s afraid of peer review. Science 342: 60–65.
    Science  
  8. Cacciatore, Michael A., Dietram A. Scheufele, and Shanto Iyengar. 2016. The end of framing as we know it ...a…
    Mass Communication and Society  
  9. Carpenter, Siri. 2012. Government sanctions Harvard psychologist. Science 337: 1283.
    Science  
  10. Check, Erika, and David Cyranoski. 2005. Korean scandal will have global fallout. Nature 438: 1056–1057.
    Nature  
  11. Communicating science effectively: A research agenda
  12. Dahlstrom, Michael F. 2014. Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences…
    PNAS  
  13. de Vrieze, Jop. 2017. Science wars’ veteran has a new mission. Science 358: 159.
    Science  
  14. Downs, Julie S. 2014. Prescriptive scientific narratives for communicating usable science. PNAS 111(Supplemen…
    PNAS  
  15. Enserink, Martin. 2012. Final report on Stapel also blames field as a whole. Science 338: 1270–1271.
    Science  
  16. Fang, Ferris C., R. Grant Steen, and Arturo Casadevall. 2012. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retract…
    PNAS  
  17. Hilgard, Joseph and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2017. Science as ‘broken’ versus science as ‘self- correcting’: H…
  18. Holland, Earle M. 2007. The risks and advantages of framing science. Science 317: 1168.
    Science  
  19. Hoy, Anne Q. 2018. Engagement helps scientists tackle global challenges. Science 361: 372–373.
    Science  
  20. Ioannides, John P.A. 2005a. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JA…
    JAMA  
  21. Ioannides, John P.A. 2005b. Why most published research findings are false. PloS medicine 2.8.e124: 0696-0701.
  22. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2018. Crisis or self-correction: Rethinking media narratives about the well-being of…
    PNAS  
  23. Kahan, D.M. 2012. Why are we poles apart on climate change? Nature 488: 255.
    Nature  
  24. Katz, Yarden. 2013. Against storytelling of scientfic results. Nature Methods 10(11): 1045.
    Nature Methods  
  25. Kim, Sei-Hill, Ed. 2019. Beyond framing: A forum for framing researchers. Journalism & mass communication qua…
  26. Kock, Christian. 2017. Gorgias reloaded: A new-found dialogue between Gorgias and Socrates. Deliberative rhet…
  27. Krippendorff, Klaus. 2017. Three concepts to retire. Annals of the international communication association 41…
    Annals of the international communication association  
  28. Kuijper, I.Margriet. 2011. Public acceptance challenges for onshore CO2 storage in Barendrecht. Energy Proced…
    Energy Procedia  
  29. Leshner, Alan I. 2012. Capably communicating science. Science 337: 777.
    Science  
  30. Leshner, Alan I. 2015. Bridging the opinion gap. Editorial. Science 347: 459.
    Science  
  31. Lewis, Simon L. 2014. Scientist-versus-activist debates mislead the public.” Nature 506: 409.
  32. Makri, Anita. 2017. Give the public the tools to trust scientists. Nature 541: 261.
    Nature  
  33. Mellor, Felicity. 2018. Review: The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication. Public understan…
    Public understanding of science  
  34. Nisbet, Matthew C. and Chris Mooney. 2007. Framing science. Science 316:56.
    Science  
  35. Houston, we have a narrative: why science needs story
  36. Prinz, Florian, Thomas Schlange, and Khusru Asadullah. 2011. Believe it or not: How much can we rely on publi…
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery  
  37. Rowland, F. Sherwood. 1993. President’s lecture: The need for scientific communication with the public. Scien…
    Science  
  38. Salomon, Jean-Jacques. 2001. Society talks back. Nature 412: 585–586.
    Nature  
  39. Schenkel, Roland. 2010. The challenge of feeding scientific advice into policy-making. Science 330: 1749–1751.
    Science  
  40. Sheldon, Tom. 2018. Preprints could promote confusion and distortion. Nature 559: 445.
    Nature  
  41. Simmons, Joseph P., Leif D. Nelson, and Uri Simonsohn. 2011. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibili…
    Psychological Science  
  42. Światkowski, Wojciech, and Benoît Dompnier. 2017. Replicability crisis in social psychology: Looking at the p…
    International review of social psychology  
  43. Trafimow, David, and Michael Marks. 2015. Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 37: 1–2.
    Basic and Applied Social Psychology  
  44. van der Linden, Sander, Anthony Leiserowitz, Seth Rosenthal, and Edward Maibach. 2017. Inoculating the public…
  45. Van Noorden, R. 2011. The trouble with retractions”. Nature 478: 26–28.
    Nature  
  46. Wasserstein, Ronald L., and Nicole A. Lazar. 2016. The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process and purp…
    The American statistician  
  47. Whitmarsh, Lorraine, Dimitrios Xenias, and Christopher R. Jones. 2019. Framing effects on public support for …
    Palgrave Communications