Most Any Reason Is Better Than None: Consequences of Implausible Reasons and Warrants in Brief Written Arguments

Christopher R. Wolfe Miami University ; Hongli Gao Xinxiang Medical University ; Minhua Wu Central China Normal University ; Michael Albrecht

Abstract

Argumentation schema theory guided four experiments on the processing of plausible and implausible reasons and warrant statements testing the hypothesis that most reasons produce greater agreement with claims than when claims are presented without support. Another hypothesis was that leaving warrants unstated often produces greater agreement than when the warrant is made explicit. In Study 1, American participants were more likely to agree with claims after they read arguments than beforehand—even those with implausible reasons and warrants. In Study 2, American history and environmental science majors read brief arguments and agreed more with implausible arguments than claims alone. Study 3, with Chinese participants, replicated some but not all earlier results. In Study 4, with Chinese participants, blatantly false claims supported by bogus reasons yielded marginally greater agreement than unsupported claims. These findings suggest that many people have uncritical argumentation schemata with low support thresholds, making them vulnerable to weak and bogus arguments.

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2018-07-01
DOI
10.1177/0741088318767370
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. College English

Cites in this index (2)

  1. Written Communication
  2. Written Communication
Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1023/B:JMTE.0000021943.35739.1c
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168414
  3. 10.1111/hcre.12054
  4. 10.3758/s13428-015-0681-1
  5. 10.1007/s10648-010-9149-0
  6. 10.22329/il.v16i3.2456
  7. 10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_6
  8. 10.1111/jcal.12118
  9. 10.22329/il.v17i1.2396
  10. 10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.258
  11. 10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1
  12. 10.1080/13546783.2014.1002534
  13. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291
  14. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
  15. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.004
  16. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.10.001
  17. 10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5
  18. 10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
  19. 10.1080/19462166.2015.1123772
  20. 10.1080/13546780701527674
  21. 10.1007/s10503-015-9352-8
CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →