Most Any Reason Is Better Than None: Consequences of Implausible Reasons and Warrants in Brief Written Arguments

Written Communication Jul 2018

Most Any Reason Is Better Than None: Consequences of Implausible Reasons and Warrants in Brief Written Arguments

Christopher R. Wolfe Miami University ; Hongli Gao Xinxiang Medical University ; Minhua Wu Central China Normal University ; Michael Albrecht

Abstract

Argumentation schema theory guided four experiments on the processing of plausible and implausible reasons and warrant statements testing the hypothesis that most reasons produce greater agreement with claims than when claims are presented without support. Another hypothesis was that leaving warrants unstated often produces greater agreement than when the warrant is made explicit. In Study 1, American participants were more likely to agree with claims after they read arguments than beforehand—even those with implausible reasons and warrants. In Study 2, American history and environmental science majors read brief arguments and agreed more with implausible arguments than claims alone. Study 3, with Chinese participants, replicated some but not all earlier results. In Study 4, with Chinese participants, blatantly false claims supported by bogus reasons yielded marginally greater agreement than unsupported claims. These findings suggest that many people have uncritical argumentation schemata with low support thresholds, making them vulnerable to weak and bogus arguments.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2018-07-01
DOI: 10.1177/0741088318767370
Open Access: Closed
Topics: argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

Wolfe et al. (2023)

Written Arguments About Vaccination: Experimental Studies in the United States …

Written Communication
Li et al. (2020)

Inductively Versus Deductively Structured Product Descriptions: Effects on Chin…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Hesse (2019)

Journals in Composition Studies, Thirty-Five Years After

College English

Cites in this index (2)

Wolfe (2011)

Argumentation Across the Curriculum

Written Communication
Wolfe et al. (2009)

Argumentation Schema and the Myside Bias in Written Argumentation

Written Communication

Also cites 21 works outside this index ↓

10.1023/B:JMTE.0000021943.35739.1c

↗
10.1371/journal.pone.0168414

↗
10.1111/hcre.12054

↗
10.3758/s13428-015-0681-1

↗
10.1007/s10648-010-9149-0

↗
10.22329/il.v16i3.2456

↗
10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8_6

↗
10.1111/jcal.12118

↗
10.22329/il.v17i1.2396

↗
10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.258

↗
10.1207/s1532690xci1402_1

↗
10.1080/13546783.2014.1002534

↗
10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291

↗
10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2

↗
10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.004

↗
10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.10.001

↗
10.1007/978-90-481-9473-5

↗
10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0

↗
10.1080/19462166.2015.1123772

↗
10.1080/13546780701527674

↗
10.1007/s10503-015-9352-8

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 10 View in citation network →