Written Arguments About Vaccination: Experimental Studies in the United States and China

Written Communication Oct 2023

Written Arguments About Vaccination: Experimental Studies in the United States and China

Christopher R. Wolfe Miami University ; Hongli Gao Xinxiang Medical University ; Junjie Wu Central China Normal University ; Yizhu Wang Xinxiang Medical University ; Josselyn E. Marroquín Miami University ; Wylie Brace Miami University

Abstract

Guided by argumentation schema theory, we conducted five psychological studies in the United States and China on arguments about vaccination. Study 1 replicated research about arguments on several topics, finding that agreement judgments are weighted toward claims, whereas quality judgments are weighted toward reasons. However, consistent with recent research, when this paradigm was extended to arguments about vaccination (Study 2), claims received more weight than reasons in judgments about agreement and quality. Studies 3 and 4 were conducted in the United States and China on how people process counterarguments against anti-vaccination assertions. Rebuttals did not influence agreement but played a role in argument quality judgments. Both political position (in the United States) and medical education (in China) predicted differences in argument evaluation. Bad reasons lowered agreement (Study 5), especially among participants studying health care. Political polarization apparently heightens the impact of claim side in the argumentation schema, likely to the detriment of public discourse.

Journal: Written Communication
Published: 2023-10-01
DOI: 10.1177/07410883231179935
Open Access: Closed
Topics: public rhetoric argument

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (6)

Wolfe et al. (2018)

Most Any Reason Is Better Than None: Consequences of Implausible Reasons and Wa…

Written Communication
Scott et al. (2015)

Rhetoric, Ebola, and Vaccination: A Conversation Among Scholars

Poroi
Lawrence (2015)

Book Review: Vaccinations and Public Concern in History: Legend, Rumor, and Ris…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Wolfe (2012)

Individual Differences in the “Myside Bias” in Reasoning and Written Argumentation

Written Communication
Segal (2009)

Internet Health and the 21st-Century Patient

Written Communication

Show all 6 →

Wolfe et al. (2009)

Argumentation Schema and the Myside Bias in Written Argumentation

Written Communication

Also cites 20 works outside this index ↓

10.1371/journal.pone.0191728

↗
10.1186/s12889-021-12114-8

↗
10.1080/01638530701739207

↗
10.2105/AJPH.2020.305869

↗
10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567

↗
10.2196/19504

↗
10.2196/jmir.4153

↗
10.1353/con.2017.0020

↗
10.1080/09581596.2018.1546825

↗
10.1080/08964289.2019.1619511

↗
10.1007/s10461-020-02925-y

↗
10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.025

↗
10.5744/rhm.2018.1010

↗
10.1007/s10912-014-9278-4

↗
10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.08.004

↗
10.1371/journal.pone.0264019

↗
10.1007/s10503-005-4419-6

↗
10.1002/acp.3894

↗
10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.10.004

↗
10.3758/s13428-022-01840-5

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network →