Argumentation Aug 2015

A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Argument Predispositions in China: Argumentativeness, Verbal Aggressiveness, Argument Frames, and Personalization of Conflict

Yun Xie Sun Yat-sen University ; Dale Hample University of Maryland, College Park ; Xiaoli Wang South China Normal University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2015-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-015-9352-8
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (7)

  1. Valchev (2025)
    Explaining Real-Life Practical Argumentation on the Basis of Empirical Data Reg…
    Argumentation
  2. Jodoi (2025)
    The Effects of Parliamentary Debate as a Pedagogy for Argumentation in L1 and L…
    Argumentation
  3. Jodoi (2023)
    The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Comp…
    Argumentation
  4. Valchev (2022)
    The Cultural Embeddedness of Arguments Raised as a Part of the Bulgarian Debate…
    Argumentation
  5. Kim et al. (2020)
    How do Culture, Individual Traits, and Context Influence Koreans’ Interpersonal…
    Argumentation
Show all 7 →
  1. Demir et al. (2019)
    A Cross-Cultural Study of Argument Orientations of Turkish and American College…
    Argumentation
  2. Wolfe et al. (2018)
    Most Any Reason Is Better Than None: Consequences of Implausible Reasons and Wa…
    Written Communication

References (35) · 3 in this index

  1. TA Avtgis (2004)
    Avtgis, T.A., and A.S. Rancer. 2004. Personalization of conflict across cultures: A comparison among the Unit…
    Journal of Intercultural Communication Research
  2. CB Becker (1986)
    Becker, C.B. 1986. Reasons for the lack of argumentation and debate in the Far East. International Journal of…
    International Journal of Intercultural Relations  ↗
  3. MJ Bresnahan (2002)
    Bresnahan, M.J., S.M. Shearman, S.Y. Lee, R. Ohashi, and D. Mosher. 2002. Personal and cultural differences i…
    Asian Journal of Social Psychology  ↗
  4. M Garrett (1993)
    Garrett, M. 1993. Pathos reconsidered from the perspective of classical Chinese rhetorical theories. Quarterl…
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
  5. J Gernet (1995)
    Buddhism in Chinese society: An economic history from the fifth to the tenth Centuries
Show all 35 →
  1. D Hample (2003)
    Handbook of communication and social interaction skills
  2. D Hample (2015)
    Hample, D., and D. Anagondahalli. 2015. Understandings of arguing in India and the United States: Argument fr…
    Journal of Intercultural Communication Research
  3. D Hample (2010)
    Arguments, aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory and research
  4. D Hample (1995)
    Hample, D., and J.M. Dallinger. 1995. A Lewinian perspective on taking conflict personally: Revision, refinem…
    Communication Quarterly  ↗
  5. Hample et al. (2010)
    The Aggressiveness of Playful Arguments
    Argumentation
  6. D Hample (2013)
    Hample, D., A.S. Richards, and C. Skubisz. 2013. Blurting. Communication Monographs 80: 503–532.
    Communication Monographs  ↗
  7. Hample et al. (2009)
    Framing and Editing Interpersonal Arguments
    Argumentation
  8. CF Hsu (2007)
    Hsu, C.F. 2007. A cross-cultural comparison of communication orientations between Americans and Taiwanese. Co…
    Communication Quarterly  ↗
  9. DA Infante (1982)
    Infante, D.A., and A.S. Rancer. 1982. A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Person…
    Journal of Personality Assessment  ↗
  10. DA Infante (1986)
    Infante, D.A., and C.J. Wigley. 1986. Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communicatio…
    Communication Monographs  ↗
  11. Jensen (1987)
    Rhetorical Emphases of Taoism
    Rhetorica
  12. J Jensen (1992)
    Jensen, J. 1992. Values and practices in Asian argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy 28(4): 153–166.
    Argumentation and Advocacy  ↗
  13. GA Kennedy (1980)
    Classical rhetoric and its christian and secular tradition from ancient to modern times
  14. Ej Kim (2015)
    Kim, Ej, A. Yamaguchi, M.-S. Kim, and A. Miyahara. 2015. Effects of taking conflict personally on conflict ma…
    Personality and Individual Differences  ↗
  15. (1987)
    Communication theory: Eastern and western perspectives
  16. K Leung (1988)
    Leung, K. 1988. Some determinants of conflict avoidance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 19: 35–49.
    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology  ↗
  17. K Leung (1997)
    New perspectives on international industrial and organizational psychology
  18. Y Lin (2007)
    Lin, Y., A.S. Rancer, and Q. Kong. 2007. Family communication patterns and argumentativeness: An investigatio…
    Human Communication
  19. Y Lin (2010)
    Arguments, aggression, and conflict: New directions in theory
  20. U Lorenzo-Seva (2006)
    Lorenzo-Seva, U., and J.M.F. ten Berge. 2006. Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor…
    Methodology  ↗
  21. X Lu (1993)
    Lu, X., and D. Frank. 1993. On the study of the ancient Chinese rhetoric/bian. Western Journal of Communicati…
    Western Journal of Communication  ↗
  22. H Mercier (2011)
    Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentation theory. Behavioral an…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  ↗
  23. JG Oetzel (2003)
    Oetzel, J.G., and S. Ting-Toomey. 2003. Face concerns in interpersonal conflict: A cross-cultural empirical t…
    Communication Research  ↗
  24. JG Oetzel (2001)
    Oetzel, J.G., S. Ting-Toomey, T. Masumoto, Y. Yokichi, X. Pan, J. Takai, and R. Wilcox. 2001. Face and facewo…
    Communication Monographs  ↗
  25. R Oliver (1971)
    Communication and culture in ancient India and China
  26. AS Rancer (2014)
    Argumentative and aggressive communication
  27. H Triandis (1995)
    Individualism and collectivism
  28. Tucker, L.R. 1951. A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report No. 9…
  29. Y Xie (2013)
    Virtues of argumentation: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the Ontario…
  30. JH Yeh (2004)
    Cultural values and argumentative orientations for Chinese people in Taiwan, Hong Kong, a…
CrossRef global citation count: 24 View in citation network → Build reading path →