Inductively Versus Deductively Structured Product Descriptions: Effects on Chinese and Western Readers

Qian Li University of Twente ; Joyce Karreman University of Twente ; Menno D. T. de Jong

Abstract

This study examines the effects of inductively versus deductively organized product descriptions on Chinese and Western readers. It uses a 2 × 3 experimental design with text structure (inductive versus deductive) and cultural background (Chinese living in China, Chinese living in the Netherlands, and Westerners) as independent variables and recall, reading time, and readers’ opinions as dependent variables. Participants read a product description that explained two refrigerator types and then recommended which one to purchase. The results showed that Chinese readers rated readability and persuasiveness higher when the text was structured inductively whereas Western readers rated these aspects equally high for the inductively and deductively structured text. The results suggest that culturally preferred organizing principles do not affect readers’ ability to read and understand texts but that these principles might affect their opinions about the texts.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2020-10-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651920932192
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

References (47) · 9 in this index

  1. 10.2307/747986
  2. Technical Communication
  3. Usability evaluation in industry
  4. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
  5. 10.1075/prag.8.3.03car
Show all 47 →
  1. Journal of Anhui University (Philosophy and Social Sciences)
  2. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.012
  3. 10.2307/3588239
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  6. International Journal of Psychology
  7. 10.1515/text.1.1983.3.2.183
  8. Landmark essays on ESL writing
  9. 10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00040-9
  10. 10.1080/13488678.2002.10801089
  11. 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.005
  12. 10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3
  13. Kanagawa University International Management Review
  14. Chinese perspectives in rhetoric and communication
  15. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01242.x
  16. 10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12
  17. Han ying yupian zhuti yu duanluo jiegou moshi de bijiao yanjiu
  18. Technical Communication
  19. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  20. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  21. Technical Communication
  22. 10.1109/ProComm.2019.00011
  23. 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.004
  24. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
  25. Foreign Language Education
  26. Intercultural Communication Studies
  27. 10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.38
  28. 10.1080/03637750128061
  29. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  30. Intercultural communication: A discourse approach
  31. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  32. Technical Communication Quarterly
  33. Hermes–Journal of Language and Communication Studies
  34. Forward Position
  35. 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.098
  36. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  37. Tran T. (2007). Indirectness in Vietnamese newspaper commentaries: A pilot study [Doctoral dissertation, Bowl…
  38. 10.2307/30036540
  39. Technical Communication
  40. Written Communication
  41. Journal of Zhengzhou University
  42. Technical Communication