An Indirect Style in Business Communication

Daniel D. Ding Ferris State University

Abstract

This article investigates how Confucianism inspires an indirect style in professional communication in China. Particularly, the author examines two major philosophical principles of Confucianism, Li (rituals/rules) and Ren (love/benevolence), and discusses how they encourage individuals to establish proper human relationships, to humble themselves, and to shun pure personal profits. Dictated by Confucianism, Chinese writers often focus on interpersonal relationships, humble themselves, and avoid personal profits before discussing pertinent business issues. As a result, Chinese writers are indirect in their style. They often employ the indirect style to accommodate two pragmatic acts: (a) establishing their ethos that helps create a strong bond between individuals at a more personal level and (b) building a harmonious social structure at a more societal level. Such a style is conducive to successful business transactions. So, it should not be explained as ineffective or as mere digressions.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2006-01-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651905281051
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (10)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Cites in this index (3)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 7 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1093/elt/52.4.323
  2. 10.1080/09585200210164566d
  3. 10.1353/pew.2003.0039
  4. 10.1080/09552360050001752
  5. 10.1177/002194369503200401
  6. 10.1207/S15326926CLP0503_2
  7. 10.1080/03050060020020435
CrossRef global citation count: 43 View in citation network →