Convergence in the Rhetorical Pattern of Directness and Indirectness in Chinese and U.S. Business Letters

Junhua Wang University of Minnesota, Duluth

Abstract

This article examines rhetorical patterns in claim letters from two universities, one in China and one in the United States, to see whether these patterns are convergent. A genre-based textual analysis of the claim letters, written by two different cultural groups of participants, found that both groups of letters display a similar rhetorical preference for directness and indirectness. The author explores how local contextual factors have contributed to these groups of participants’ preference for similar rhetorical patterns and calls for the integration of contextual factors in intercultural rhetoric research, practice, and pedagogy.

Journal
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Published
2010-01-01
DOI
10.1177/1050651909346933
Open Access
Closed
Topics

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (10)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  3. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Cites in this index (4)

  1. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly
  3. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. Technical Communication Quarterly
Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.1177/108056999405700104
  2. Campbell, C.P. ( 1998). A bridge between high-context and low-context cultures? In S. Miemeier, C. P. Campbel…
  3. 10.1016/j.jeap.2004.07.003
  4. Connor, U. ( 2008). Mapping multidimensional aspects of research: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric. In U. C…
  5. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
  6. 10.1075/pbns.169.18mat
  7. Tebeaux, E. & Driskill, L. ( 1997). Culture and the shape of rhetoric: Protocols of international document de…
  8. 10.5465/amr.1992.4279545
  9. 10.1075/pbns.141
CrossRef global citation count: 22 View in citation network →