IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2011

Designing and Developing Questionnaires for Translation Tutorial

Elizabeth A. Tuleja University of Notre Dame ; Linda Beamer Massey University ; Cass Shum University of Hong Kong ; Elisa K. Y. Chan

Abstract

Problem: Questionnaires are a popular method used by global companies to gain understanding or assess various aspects of their businesses. However, using a questionnaire across cultures requires extra effort in translating it into the target language(s) and culture(s) because a good questionnaire developed in one language/culture may not necessarily “travel well” across cultures due to differences in meaning and interpretation. This tutorial synthesizes the extant research on cross-cultural communication and surveys, and provides guidance in preparing cross-cultural questionnaires. Concepts: Translation affects the design and development of questionnaires to be used across cultures in these ways: (1) It affects the theoretical concepts to be studied: indicators-questions about concrete elements that can be measured and constructs-a series of questions about abstract elements that cannot be measured directly and essentially represent an underlying concept. Constructs must be adapted into a specific cultural context to achieve accuracy in measurements. (2) Differences in the contexts-the overall cross-cultural research context (the setting and the purpose) and the cultural context (the participants and their cultural background) of the study-affect translation because concepts in the source culture might be applied differently or not exist in the target cultures. (3) Translation might unintentionally introduce bias by inadvertently changing the perceived meanings of terms and questions-creating bias in constructs, on individual items on the questionnaire, and in its administration. (4) Translation might affect equivalence of terms in the source and translated versions, including linguistic equivalence (that is, wording of items), semantics (meaning of a phrase or concept), and grammar and syntax. Suggestions: Given these concepts, consider the following items when translating questionnaires: (1) accurately adapt or adopt questions from existing instruments, (2) make sure that you adapt the language to suit the situation, (3) hire translators who understand research processes, (4) use the decentering approach (a process in which translators move back and forth amongst the languages, checking for cultural and linguistic accuracy) when preparing the actual translation, and (5) assess your overall translated questionnaire. The questionnaire assessment model is a resource for guiding the assessment.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2011-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2011.2172834
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
discourse analysis assessment grammar and mechanics affect and writing
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (45) · 8 in this index

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.57
     ↗
  2. roster (2006)
    Can cross-national/cultural studies presume etic equivalency in respondents' use of extre…
    International Journal of Research in Marketing  ↗
  3. Ding (2006)
    An Indirect Style in Business Communication
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  4. 10.1177/108056999405700104
     ↗
  5. tuleja (2009)
    Intercultural Communication for Business
Show all 45 →
  1. nisbett (2003)
    The Geography of Thought How Asians and Westerners Think Differently and Why
  2. beamer (2003)
    Unpublished Study of Joint Venture Communication in Shanghai
  3. 10.1177/0022022104272905
     ↗
  4. 10.1177/1470595806066332
     ↗
  5. xing (1995)
    The Chinese cultural system: Implications for cross-cultural management
    S A M Adv Manage J
  6. WEISS (1997)
    Reading Culture: Professional Communication as Translation
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  7. willis (0)
    Overview of methods for developing equivalent methods across multiple cultural groups
    8th Conf Health Survey Res Meth US Dept Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Ctr Health Stat Hyattsville
  8. (2003)
    Cross-Cultural Survey Methods
  9. 10.1177/1094428103251542
     ↗
  10. Tuleja et al. (2011)
    An Analysis of a Communication Training Program for Chinese Managers
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  11. van de vijver (1997)
    Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research
  12. fahr (2006)
    Approaches to scale development in Chinese management research
    Manage Organiz Rev  ↗
  13. 10.1057/9780230511590
     ↗
  14. perry (1997)
    Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions
    Psychol Meth  ↗
  15. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490188
     ↗
  16. 10.1177/0022022198291004
     ↗
  17. 10.1177/1470595806064985
     ↗
  18. Devoss et al. (2002)
    Teaching Intracultural and Intercultural Communication: A Critique and Suggeste…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  19. van de vijver (2003)
    Cross-Cultural Survey Methods
  20. 10.1177/0021943607302477
     ↗
  21. MAYLATH (1997)
    Writing Globally: Teaching the Technical Writing Student to Prepare Documents f…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  22. 10.1177/0022022189202002
     ↗
  23. LEININGER (1997)
    The Alignment of Global Management Strategies, International Communication Appr…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  24. Tebeaux (1999)
    Designing Written Business Communication along the Shifting Cultural Continuum:…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  25. ooft (1999)
    Global issues, local concerns
    Tech Commun
  26. brislin (2000)
    Understanding Culture's Influence on Behaviour
  27. WEISS (1998)
    Technical Communication across Cultures: Five Philosophical Questions
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  28. braun (2003)
    Cross-Cultural Survey Methods
  29. 10.1108/17465640810920304
     ↗
  30. werner (1970)
    Translating, working through interpreters, and the problem of decentering
    A Handbook of Cultural Anthropology
  31. 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00033.x
     ↗
  32. armer (1973)
    Comparative Social Research Methodological Problems and Strategies
  33. berlo (1960)
    The Process of Communication
  34. hofstede (2005)
    Cultures Organiz
  35. 10.1080/13645570701401032
     ↗
  36. 10.1023/A:1006941729637
     ↗
  37. (0)
  38. van de vijver (2000)
    Handbook of Cross-cultural and Multicultural Personality Assessment
  39. brislin (1986)
    Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Psychology
  40. triandis (1989)
    Individualism-collectivism and psychological needs: Their relationships in two cultures
    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Sep 2024
    Positive Evaluation in the Translation of Online Promotional Discourse in the Cheese Industry ↗
    Belén Labrador; Noelia Ramón
    discourse analysis argument assessment professional writing multilingual writers grammar and mechanics affect and writing book reviews
  2. Assessing Writing Jan 2026
    The effects of online resource use on L2 learners’ computer-mediated writing processes and written products ↗
    Honglan Wang; Jookyoung Jung
    revision argument assessment digital rhetoric multilingual writers grammar and mechanics affect and writing
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric Sep 2024
    Where’s the Rhetoric? Imagining a Unified Field ↗
    Joshua Hanan
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism composition theory genre theory discourse analysis cultural rhetorics argument qualitative research quantitative research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric editorial matter
  4. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2024
    For the Enjoyment of the People: The Creation of National Identity in American Public Lands ↗
    Kyra Bowar
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument assessment public rhetoric affect and writing
  5. Teaching English in the Two-Year College Sep 2024
    Instructional Note: The Labor of Ungrading ↗
    Nicole Hancock
    discourse analysis two-year college teacher development assessment affect and writing