Designing and Developing Questionnaires for Translation Tutorial

Elizabeth A. Tuleja; Linda Beamer; Cass Shum; Elisa K. Y. Chan

doi:10.1109/tpc.2011.2172834

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2011

Designing and Developing Questionnaires for Translation Tutorial

Elizabeth A. Tuleja University of Notre Dame ; Linda Beamer Massey University ; Cass Shum University of Hong Kong ; Elisa K. Y. Chan

Abstract

Problem: Questionnaires are a popular method used by global companies to gain understanding or assess various aspects of their businesses. However, using a questionnaire across cultures requires extra effort in translating it into the target language(s) and culture(s) because a good questionnaire developed in one language/culture may not necessarily “travel well” across cultures due to differences in meaning and interpretation. This tutorial synthesizes the extant research on cross-cultural communication and surveys, and provides guidance in preparing cross-cultural questionnaires. Concepts: Translation affects the design and development of questionnaires to be used across cultures in these ways: (1) It affects the theoretical concepts to be studied: indicators-questions about concrete elements that can be measured and constructs-a series of questions about abstract elements that cannot be measured directly and essentially represent an underlying concept. Constructs must be adapted into a specific cultural context to achieve accuracy in measurements. (2) Differences in the contexts-the overall cross-cultural research context (the setting and the purpose) and the cultural context (the participants and their cultural background) of the study-affect translation because concepts in the source culture might be applied differently or not exist in the target cultures. (3) Translation might unintentionally introduce bias by inadvertently changing the perceived meanings of terms and questions-creating bias in constructs, on individual items on the questionnaire, and in its administration. (4) Translation might affect equivalence of terms in the source and translated versions, including linguistic equivalence (that is, wording of items), semantics (meaning of a phrase or concept), and grammar and syntax. Suggestions: Given these concepts, consider the following items when translating questionnaires: (1) accurately adapt or adopt questions from existing instruments, (2) make sure that you adapt the language to suit the situation, (3) hire translators who understand research processes, (4) use the decentering approach (a process in which translators move back and forth amongst the languages, checking for cultural and linguistic accuracy) when preparing the actual translation, and (5) assess your overall translated questionnaire. The questionnaire assessment model is a resource for guiding the assessment.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2011-12-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2011.2172834
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: discourse analysis assessment grammar and mechanics affect and writing
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (8)

Tuleja et al. (2011)

An Analysis of a Communication Training Program for Chinese Managers

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Ding (2006)

An Indirect Style in Business Communication

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Devoss et al. (2002)

Teaching Intracultural and Intercultural Communication

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Tebeaux (1999)

Designing Written Business Communication along the Shifting Cultural Continuum

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
WEISS (1998)

Technical Communication across Cultures

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Show all 8 →

WEISS (1997)

Reading Culture

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
MAYLATH (1997)

Writing Globally

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
LEININGER (1997)

The Alignment of Global Management Strategies, International Communication Appr…

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Also cites 19 works outside this index ↓

10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.57

↗
roster (2006)

Can cross-national/cultural studies presume etic equivalency in respondents' use of extre…

International Journal of Research in Marketing ↗
10.1177/108056999405700104

↗
10.1177/0022022104272905

↗
10.1177/1470595806066332

↗
10.1177/1094428103251542

↗
fahr (2006)

Approaches to scale development in Chinese management research

Manage Organiz Rev ↗
10.1057/9780230511590

↗
perry (1997)

Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions

Psychol Meth ↗
10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490188

↗
10.1177/0022022198291004

↗
10.1177/1470595806064985

↗
10.1177/0021943607302477

↗
10.1177/0022022189202002

↗
10.1108/17465640810920304

↗
10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00033.x

↗
10.1080/13645570701401032

↗
10.1023/A:1006941729637

↗
triandis (1989)

Individualism-collectivism and psychological needs: Their relationships in two cultures

Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 8 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Designing and Developing Questionnaires for Translation Tutorial

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

Cites in this index (8)

Related Articles