Using Google Docs for Peer-then-Teacher Review on Middle School Students’ Writing

Kalianne L. Neumann Oklahoma State University ; Theodore J. Kopcha University of Georgia
Journal
Computers and Composition
Published
2019-12-01
DOI
10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (56) · 10 in this index

  1. Revising process
    Studies in writing (Vol. 9). Through the models of writing
  2. Response to writing
    Handbook of writing research
  3. Technology and secondary writing: A review of the literature
    Contemporary Educational Technology  
  4. Effects of collaborative revision on children’s ability to write understandable narrative texts
    Studies in writing (Vol. 13). Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes
  5. Papers are never finished, just abandoned: The role of written teacher comments in the re…
    Journal of Response to Writing
Show all 56 →
  1. Student revision with peer and expert reviewing
    Learning and Instruction  
  2. Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
    Computers & Education  
  3. Written Communication
  4. English language arts standards: Writing
  5. A concise introduction to mixed methods research
  6. Extending Google Docs to collaborate on research papers: Technical report
  7. Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle scho…
    Journal of Educational Psychology  
  8. Uncovering substance: Teaching revision in the high school classroom
    Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy  
  9. College Composition and Communication
  10. Best practices in teaching argumentative writing
    Best practices in writing instruction
  11. Teaching children about revision in writing
    Cognition and Instruction  
  12. The writer’s toolbox: Five tools for active revision instruction
    Language Arts  
  13. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing
    The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications
  14. What triggers revision?
    Studies in writing (Vol. 13). Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes
  15. College Composition and Communication
  16. The impact of Google Docs on student collaboration: A UAE case study
    Learning Culture and Social Interaction  
  17. Computers and Composition
  18. Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating wiki technology and peer feedback into Eng…
    English Teaching: Practice and Critique
  19. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation
  20. Research in the Teaching of English
  21. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing
    Journal of Second Language Writing  
  22. Evaluation and revision
    Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology
  23. Best practices in teaching evaluation and revision
    Best practices in writing instruction
  24. Instruction in evaluation and revision
    Handbook of writing research
  25. Insights from instructional research on revision with struggling writers
    Studies in Writing (Vol. 13). Revision: Cognitive and instructional processes
  26. Cognitive factors in the development of children’s writing
    Handbook of writing research
  27. Internal revision: A process of discovery
    Research on composing: Points of departure
  28. The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
    Instructional Science  
  29. Computers and Composition
  30. The revising processes of sixth-grade writers with and without peer feedback
    The Journal of Educational Research  
  31. Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers’ tex…
    Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences  
  32. Journal of Writing Research
  33. The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
    Journal of Second Language Writing  
  34. The impact of digital tools on student writing and how writing is taught in schools
  35. Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the qua…
    Language Teaching Research  
  36. Differences in the uptake of peer and teacher feedback
    RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research  
  37. “But teacher, I added a period!” Middle schoolers learn to revise
    Voices from the Middle  
  38. Research on written composition
    Handbook of research on teaching
  39. The reliability and validity of peer review of writing in high school AP English classes
    Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy  
  40. Relationships between reading and writing development
    Handbook of writing research
  41. Smarter Balanced 4-point argumentative performance task writing rubric (grades 6-11)
  42. College Composition and Communication
  43. Computers and Composition
  44. The effects of collaborative writing activity using Google Docs on students’ writing abilities
    Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology
  45. Best classroom practices
    Revision: History, theory, and practice
  46. Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
    Journal of Second Language Writing  
  47. The effects of text messaging and instant messaging on literacy
    English Studies  
  48. Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic
    Fam Med
  49. Case study research: Design and methods
  50. Middle school students’ writing and feedback in a cloud-based classroom environment
    Technology, Knowledge & Learning  
  51. Written Communication