Burke's Act in A Rhetoric of Motives

Clayton W. Lewis

doi:10.2307/376944

College English Apr 1984

Burke's Act in A Rhetoric of Motives

Clayton W. Lewis

Abstract

In his critical writing Kenneth Burke approaches texts as for dealing with situations.I In terms of his dramatistic pentad, each text may be seen as an or strategy which responds to a given scene or situation (GM, p. xv). His approach that a [text's] structure is to be described most accurately by thinking always of the [text's] function. It assumes that the [text] is designed to 'do something' for the [writer] and his readers, and that we can make the most relevant observations about its design by considering the [text] as the embodiment of this act (PLF, p. 89). But Burke's own texts have rarely been approached with Burke's critical methods. Few have been seen as strategies that respond to particular historical-cultural situations. Yet is is clear from Counterstatement (1931) through Language as Symbolic Action (1966) that Burke's texts name and strategically respond to particular historical-cultural situations. In A Rhetoric of Motives (1950) the situation so named is one dominated by language and thought which privilege the economic forces of production (RM, p. 290) and the scientific ideals of an 'impersonal' terminology (RM, p. 32). Burke's pentad clusters these emphases in modern thought and language under the term scene; that is, all favor motivational explanations based in the scene. Thus in A Rhetoric of Motives the scene Burke addresses, the situation he names, is one which emphasizes the scenic. Burke's strategic response to this situation is to restore an emphasis on act: substance, in the old philosophy, was an act; and a way of life is an acting together (RM, p. 21). In A Rhetoric of Motives Burke aims to change the reader's central emphasis from scene to act. Yet, while intending this emphasis, Burke in his writing is also aware of a tendency to slight the term, act, in the very featuring of it. For we may even favor it enough to select it as our point of departure (point of departure in the sense of an ancestral term from which all the others are derived, sharing its quality 'substantially'); but by the same token it may come to be a point of departure in the sense of the term that is 'left behind' (GM, p. 65). Burke acknowledges the difficulty of writing against his times-against the prevailing

Journal: College English
Published: 1984-04-01
DOI: 10.2307/376944
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism body and rhetoric editorial matter
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Johnson (1988)

Reader‐response and thepathosprinciple

Rhetoric Review

References (0)

No references on file for this article.

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Burke's Act in A Rhetoric of Motives

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

References (0)

Related Articles