Abstract
Abstract As our discipline’s scholars, we must recognize that ours is a history “that is best recognized as an always incomplete narrative” and continue to delve the past as we seek to inform our future (Lerner 25). In this article, I delve into Plato’s use of “elenchus” or cross-questioning for the purpose of achieving “aporia”—the sense of perplexity or confusion that usually accompanies the discovery that language does not have the ability to mean in any stable sense” within Theaetetus (Raign 90). In addition to extending our narrative history, studying the process of elenchus will allow us to share this methodology with our tutors, so that they can develop the ability not to merely engage in conversation with their students, or lead them to a truth not their own, but engage in the type of inquiry about language and its ability to mean that leads students toward the sort of self-discovery present in the Platonic dialogues.
- Journal
- Praxis: A Writing Center Journal
- Published
- 2017
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Gold
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Citation data not yet available for this article.
Citation data is not available for Praxis: A Writing Center Journal. This journal's publisher does not deposit reference lists with CrossRef.
Related Articles
-
Composition Forum Mar 2026
-
Journal of Writing Analytics Jan 2026Session Notes as Writing Analytics: Measuring Process- and Product-Focused Feedback Across Writing Centers ↗Emily Dux Speltz
-
Journal of Writing Analytics Jan 2026Kristin I. Terrill
-
Praxis: A Writing Center Journal 2026Roycelin Rogers DeLeon
-
Praxis: A Writing Center Journal 2026Katelyn Lentz