Abstract
In this study, university students are faced with the task of collaboratively writing an argumentative synthesis from multiple sources. Specifically, in writing, they must integrate conflicting information on a particular issue obtained from reading two texts that present different perspectives. As research in this field has shown, university students’ transactional beliefs about writing have a bearing on the quality of the texts that they write. In addition, studies on collaborative learning have demonstrated the role of constructive strategies in addressing controversy. Constructive strategies require an epistemic approach, which implies understanding and integrating opposing positions and rationales. Therefore, the specific aims of the study are to analyze the relationships between the following: (a) writing beliefs and the joint written synthesis, b) writing beliefs and the strategies used to address the controversies that emerge during collaborative writing, and (c) how students resolve controversies and the quality of their joint syntheses. The participants were 52 fourth-year psychology students at a state-run university in Madrid. The results show that transactional writing beliefs are associated with both the controversy strategies employed by members of student dyads and the quality of the joint syntheses. Furthermore, the strategies for addressing controversy are associated with the quality of the joint syntheses.
- Journal
- Journal of Writing Research
- Published
- 2016-10-01
- DOI
- 10.17239/jowr-2016.08.02.02
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Diamond
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026Tim Lockridge
-
Computers and Composition Jun 2026Legacies, commitments, and new challenges: The sweetland digital rhetoric collaborative interviews three generations of computers and composition editors ↗Ali Alalem; Alyse Campbell; Thais Rodrigues Cons; Funmilola Fadairo; Nicole Koyuki Golden
-
Assessing Writing Apr 2026Task complexity, collaborative writing, and learner engagement: Examining second language learners’ writing performance ↗Syed Muhammad Mujtaba; Tiefu Zhang; Natalia Sletova
-
Journal of Business and Technical Communication Mar 2026Intercultural Communication in Technical and Professional Communication Classrooms: UNITE Strategies to Support Instructors’ Implementation of Intercultural Communication Collaborations ↗Saveena (Chakrika) Veeramoothoo; Brandi Fuglsby
-
Written Communication Mar 2026Faculty and Administrator Perceptions of Interdisciplinary Collaborative Writing: Practices, Challenges, and Support Structures ↗Stephen Carradini; Ed Nagelhout