Abstract
This paper introduces the potentials of crossing critical rhetoric and Critical Discourse Analysis in analyzing public discourse concerning one of the “corona topics”, namely institutional communication about the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine. The application of two complementary theoretical frameworks reveals discourse negotiation and naturalization of power and ideology in a persuasive discursive practice of issuing successive contradictory messages regarding the vaccine’s safety.
- Journal
- Res Rhetorica
- Published
- 2021-12-27
- DOI
- 10.29107/rr2021.4.7
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- OA PDF Diamond
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Res Rhetorica Oct 2025Fractured borders and politics of resistance: Post-9/11 through Rabiye Kurnaz vs. George W. Bush (2022) ↗BETÜL ATEŞCİ KOÇAK
-
Res Rhetorica Oct 2025Alma Vančura
-
Res Rhetorica Jun 2025Language as a front of conflict: Russian discourse on the Ukrainian language in the context of the Russian-Ukrainian war ↗Nadia Gergalo-Dabek
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Apr 2025Nirvana Tanoukhi; Nicholas Dunn
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Dec 2024Randall Fowler