Abstract
Philostratus' Lives of the Sophists (VS) is not usually understood as a text with much relevance for rhetorical theory. But this omission cedes theory to the handbooks and reinforces the dichotomy between theory and practice. I argue that Philostratus' theory of efficacious performance—implicit as it may be—has much to offer scholars of rhetoric and classical studies. I demonstrate that Philostratus prizes improvisation not only because it reveals the paideia of the orator, who becomes a cultural ideal, but also because it affords processes of mutual constitution between orator and audience. This occurs when the sophist becomes a physical manifestation of what the moment calls for, which compels recognition from the audience. In the second part of the paper, I focus on Polemo, the most improvisatory of sophists. In the scenes in which he features, Polemo repeatedly emerges as a man and, in recognizing him, spectators come to embody their own masculinity, in turn.
- Journal
- Rhetorica
- Published
- 2021-11-01
- DOI
- 10.1525/rh.2021.39.4.432
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2022Christopher Tindale
-
Rhetorica Sep 2021Artemis Brod
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2020Fielding Montgomery
-
Advances in the History of Rhetoric May 2019Marie Lund, <i>An Argument on Rhetorical Style</i> . Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press, 2017. 220 pp. $39.98 (paper). ISBN: 978-8771842203. ↗Clayton L. Terry
-
Advances in the History of Rhetoric Sep 2016Arabella Lyon