Abstract
Philostratus' Lives of the Sophists (VS) is not usually understood as a text with much relevance for rhetorical theory. But this omission cedes theory to the handbooks and reinforces the dichotomy between theory and practice. I argue that Philostratus' theory of efficacious performance—implicit as it may be—has much to offer scholars of rhetoric and classical studies. I demonstrate that Philostratus prizes improvisation not only because it reveals the paideia of the orator, who becomes a cultural ideal, but also because it affords processes of mutual constitution between orator and audience. This occurs when the sophist becomes a physical manifestation of what the moment calls for, which compels recognition from the audience. In the second part of the paper, I focus on Polemo, the most improvisatory of sophists. In the scenes in which he features, Polemo repeatedly emerges as a man and, in recognizing him, spectators come to embody their own masculinity, in turn.
- Journal
- Rhetorica
- Published
- 2021-11-01
- DOI
- 10.1525/rh.2021.39.4.432
- CompPile
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (0)
No references on file for this article.
Related Articles
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2022Christopher Tindale
-
Rhetorica Sep 2021Artemis Brod
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2020Fielding Montgomery
-
Advances in the History of Rhetoric May 2019Marie Lund, An Argument on Rhetorical Style . Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press, 2017. 220 pp. $39.98 (paper). ISBN: 978-8771842203. ↗Clayton L. Terry
-
Advances in the History of Rhetoric Sep 2016Arabella Lyon