Cicero, <i>On Invention</i> 1.51–77 Hypothetical Syllogistic and the Early Peripatetics
Abstract
Abstract: In On Invention, Cicero discusses both induction and deduction. In regard to the latter, Cicero presents a controversy between those who advocate a five-part analysis of deductive reasoning and those who prefer three parts. The issue is not practical or pedagogical, but conceptual in nature. Cicero himself prefers analysis into five parts, and rather confusingly he presents the argument of the advocates of five parts as if it were his own. The argument is striking in that it makes elaborate use of mixed hypothetical syllogisms in order to argue for five parts. Cicero claims that the five-part analysis has been preferred by all who take their start from Aristotle and Theophrastus. A survey of what Theophrastus is reported to have said concerning the hypothetical syllogism renders Cicero's claim intelligible. That is not to say that Theophrastus himself advocated a five-part analysis. Most likely the association with him derives from his known interest in hypothetical syllogistic. Later rhetoricians who identified themselves with the Peripatos made the cormection with the founders of the school, thereby gaining authority for a controversial analysis.
- Journal
- Rhetorica
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- DOI
- 10.1525/rh.1998.16.1.25
- CompPile
- Search in CompPile ↗
- Open Access
- Closed
- Topics
- Export
- BibTeX RIS
Citation Context
Cited by in this index (1)
-
Montefusco (1998)Rhetorica
Cites in this index (0)
No references match articles in this index.
Related Articles
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2024Jin R. Choi
-
Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Feb 2024Entrepreneurial Mindsets & Rhetorical Canons: Enhancing Business Communication Pedagogy via Cross-disciplinary Theory, Praxis ↗Josie A. Burks; Craig E. Armstrong
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Jul 2023Nathaniel A. Rivers
-
Philosophy & Rhetoric Oct 2022Rachel Stroup
-
Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2022Christopher Tindale