Abstract

The role of interrogative sentences in political argumentation remains largely unexplored. This study addresses this gap by introducing a new Polish-language dataset featuring diverse examples of interrogative sentences in political discourse (election debates). The dataset serves as a unique resource for theoretical research in Argumentation Mining and Natural Language Inference through the annotation of ⟨IS, C⟩ and ⟨IS, P⟩ pairs, where IS denotes an interrogative sentence, C represents its corresponding conclusion, and P indicates a premise. The annotations primarily capture implicitly expressed argumentative structures and can serve as a benchmark for large language models (LLMs), particularly those trained on Polish-language data. Furthermore, this is the first study in Argumentation Mining where annotators independently verbalize the content of conclusions and premises conveyed through speech acts constructed with interrogative sentences. Our findings reveal that interrogative sentences in political debates most frequently function as implicature (approx. 45%), normative propositions (approx. 31%), statements expressing epistemic states (approx. 20%), and presuppositions (approx. 4%). Semantic similarity analysis confirms that annotators achieve a high level of consistency in identifying and verbalizing the content implied by interrogative sentences. The dataset provides a robust foundation for developing advanced language models and for further research into the role of interrogative sentences in political discourse.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-025-09674-z
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (76) · 1 in this index

  1. Ajjour, Y., J. Kiesel, B. Stein, and M. Potthast. 2023. Topic ontologies for arguments. In Findings of the As…
  2. How to do things with words
  3. Benini, M., F. Gobbo, and J. H. Wagemans. 2023. The logic of the arguer: Representing natural argumentative d…
    Journal of Applied Logics
  4. Blokker, N., A. Blessing, E. Dayanik, J. Kuhn, S. Padó, and G. Lapesa. 2023. Between welcome culture and bord…
    Language Resources and Evaluation  
  5. Bonsignori,V. 2007. Tag questions in English: A syntactic, pragmatic and prosodic account (PhD Thesis). Unive…
Show all 76 →
  1. Braun, D. 2011. Implicating questions. Mind & Language 26 (5): 574–595.
    Mind & Language  
  2. Budzynska, K., M. Janier, C. Reed, and P. Saint-Dizier. 2016. Theoretical foundations for illocutionary struc…
    Argument & Computation  
  3. Budzynska. K., M. Janier, C. Reed, P. Saint Dizier, M. Stede, and O. Yaskorska. 2014. A model for processing …
  4. Cardoso, H. L., R. Sousa-Silva, P. Carvalho, and B. Martins. 2023. Argumentation models and their use in corp…
    Natural Language Engineering  
  5. Chesnevar, C., S. Modgil, I. Rahwan, C. Reed, G. Simari, M. South, and S. Willmott. 2006. Towards an argument…
    The Knowledge Engineering Review  
  6. Clayman, S.E., and J. Heritage. 2002. Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in t…
    Journal of Communication  
  7. Recognizing textual entailment: Models and applications
  8. de Oliveira Fernandes, D., and S. Oswald. 2022. On the rhetorical effectiveness of implicit meaning—A pragmat…
    Languages  
  9. Edwards, J. A. 2005. The transcription of discourse. In The handbook of discourse analysis, 321–348.
  10. Eemeren, F. H. R. van Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. De Gruyter Mouton.
  11. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach
  12. Eriksson, G. 2011. Follow-up questions in political press conferences. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14): 3331–3344.
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  13. Farkas, D. F. 2022. Non-intrusive questions as a special type of non-canonical questions. Journal of Semantic…
    Journal of Semantics  
  14. Farkas, D. 2020. Canonical and non-canonical questions. University of California at Santa Cruz. Retrieved fro…
  15. Farkas, D. F. 2023. Rhetorical questions revisited. Talk presented at the University of Tübingen.
  16. Gemechu, D,. R. Ruiz-Dolz, and C. Reed. 2024. ARIES: A general benchmark for argument relation identification…
  17. Goffredo, P., E. Cabrio, S. Villata, S. Haddadan, and J. T. Sanchez. 2023. Disputool 2.0: A modular architect…
    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence  
  18. El-Assady, Gold V., M. Hautli-Janisz, A. Bögel, and T., Rohrdantz, C. Butt, M. Keim D. 2017. Visual linguisti…
    Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
  19. Gordon, T.F., H. Prakken, and D. Walton. 2007. The carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificia…
    Artificial Intelligence  
  20. Graszewicz, M. 2014. Korpus wypowiedzi polskich polityków (KWPP). Dziennikarstwo i Media 5: 205–214.
    Dziennikarstwo i Media
  21. Green, N. 2017. Manual identification of arguments with implicit conclusions using semantic rules for argumen…
  22. Syntax & Semantics 3
  23. Groenendijk, J. A. G., and M. J. B. Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics o…
  24. Haddadan, S., E. Cabrio, and S. Villata. 2018. Annotation of argument components in political debates data. I…
  25. Haddadan, S., E. Cabrio, and S. Villata. 2019b. Yes, we can! Mining arguments in 50 years of US presidential …
  26. Haddadan, S., E. Cabrio, S. Villata. 2019a. DISPUTool – A tool for the argumentative analysis of political de…
  27. Hautli-Janisz, A., K. Budzynska, C. McKillop, B. Plüss, V. Gold, and C. Reed. 2022a. Questions in argumentati…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  28. Hautli-Janisz, A., K. Budzynska, and C. Reed. 2022b. Conventional implicatures in argumentation. Languages 8 …
    Languages  
  29. Hautli-Janisz, A., Schad, E., Reed, C. 2022. Disagreement space in argument analysis. In 1st Workshop on Pers…
  30. Heritage, J. 2002. The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal o…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  31. Heritage, J. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language …
    Research on Language & Social Interaction  
  32. Hinterhölzl, R., & Munaro, N. 2021. On the illocutionary force of exclamatives and non-canonical questions. E…
  33. Hitchcock, D. 2019. We justify questions, so how does that work? In Proceedings of the Ninth International Co…
  34. Hitchcock, D. 2020 Arguing for questions. In B Garssen, F Snoeck Henkemans (Eds) From argument schemes to arg…
  35. Huddleston, R. 1994. The contrast between interrogatives and questions. Journal of Linguistics 30 (2): 411–439.
    Journal of Linguistics  
  36. Ilie, C. 2022. Strategic Questioning. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Persuasion (pp. 165–189). Rou…
  37. Ille 2023. Parliamentary Follow-ups as Rhetorical Questioning-Answering Strategies.
  38. Jo, Y., J. Visser, C. Reed, and E. Hovy. 2019. A cascade model for proposition extraction in argumentation. I…
  39. Kalouli, A.-L., Kaiser, K., Hautli-Janisz, A., Kaiser, G. A., & Butt, M. 2018. A multilingual approach to que…
  40. Argumentation illuminated
  41. Kikteva, Z., Trautsch, A., Herbold, S., & Hautli, A. 2024. Question type prediction in natural debate. In Pro…
  42. Koit, M. 2021. How are the members of a parliament arguing? Analysis of an argument corpus. In ICAART (2) (pp…
  43. Koszowy, M., S. Oswald, K. Budzynska, B. Konat, and P. Gygax. 2022. A pragmatic account of rephrase in argume…
    Informal Logic  
  44. Krifka, M. 2015. Bias in commitment space semantics: Declarative questions, negated questions, and question t…
    Semantics and Linguistic Theory  
  45. Lawrence, J., & Reed, C. 2015. Combining argument mining techniques. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Ar…
  46. Lawrence, J., and C. Reed. 2020. Argument mining: A survey. Computational Linguistics 45 (4): 765–818.
    Computational Linguistics  
  47. Pragmatics
  48. Lindahl, A., and L. Borin. 2024. Annotation for computational argumentation analysis: Issues and perspectives…
    Language and Linguistics Compass  
  49. Lippi, M., P. Torroni, Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press. 2…
    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence  
  50. Vallauri, E., L. Baranzini, D. Cimmino, F. Cominetti, C. Coppola, and G. Mannaioli. 2020. Implicit argumentat…
  51. Lomelí Hernández, J. A. 2024. Journalists’ questions in political press conferences (PhD Thesis). University …
  52. Natural language inference
  53. Menini, S., Cabrio, E., Tonelli, S., & Villata, S. 2018. Never retreat, never retract: Argumentation analysis…
  54. Ogrodniczuk, M., Głowińska, K., Kopeć, M., Savary, A., & Zawiśławska, M. 2014. Coreference: Annotation, resol…
  55. Puczyłowski, T. 2022. A taxonomy of noncanonical uses of interrogatives. Axiomathes 32 (3): 505–527.
    Axiomathes  
  56. Reboul, A. 2011. A relevance-theoretic account of the evolution of implicit communication. Studies in Pragmat…
    Studies in Pragmatics
  57. Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-networks. In Proceedi…
  58. Rocci, A., & Raimondo, C. 2017. Dialogical argumentation in financial conference calls: The request of confir…
  59. Rogowska, K.J., and M. Będkowski. 2023. Brakujące elementy argumentów w debacie konkursowej. Res Rhetorica 10…
    Res Rhetorica
  60. Rohde, H. 2006. Rhetorical questions as redundant interrogatives. San Diego Linguistics Papers, 2, 134–168. U…
  61. Ruiz-Dolz, R., M. Nofre, M. Taulé, S. Heras, and A. García-Fornes. 2021. Vivesdebate: A new annotated multili…
    Applied Sciences  
  62. Ruiz-Dolz, R., Chen, C. C., Kando, N., & Chen, H. H. 2024. Learning strategies for robust argument mining: An…
  63. Speech acts
  64. Sidorova, E. A., Akhmadeeva, I. R., Kononenko, I. S., & Chagina, P. M. 2023. The role of indicators in argume…
  65. Sosnowska, N. 2009. Oznaczanie segmentacji w zapisie tekstu mówionego. Roczniki Humanistyczne 57 (06): 189–200.
    Roczniki Humanistyczne
  66. Stede, M., & Schneider, J. 2019. Introduction. In Argumentation mining. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language …
  67. Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning
  68. Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning
  69. Asking and Answering: Rivalling approaches to interrogative methods
  70. Argumentation
  71. Zymla, M. M. 2014. Extraction and analysis of non-canonical questions from a Twitter corpus (Master’s thesis)…