Going Around in Circles

Barteld Kooi

doi:10.1007/s10503-024-09640-1

Argumentation Dec 2024 Open Access

Going Around in Circles

Barteld Kooi University of Groningen

Abstract

AbstractThis paper tries to reconcile the clash between argumentation theory and formal logic regarding circular arguments, which are regarded as the fallacy of begging the question by the former, and a benign and useful inference pattern by the latter. This paper provides a formal system which can represent circular arguments found in the literature. The formal system makes it possible to distinguish two ways in which arguments can be circular. The first type of circularity, which is vicious, is when an argument is based on an inference step which is (indirectly) supported by that inference step itself. The second kind of circularity, which is benign, occurs when one of the premises is the same proposition as the conclusion. The first type of circularity implies the second type of circularity, but not the other way round. This distinction is in line with other approaches to circular arguments. Analyzing selected examples from the literature shows the value of the formal system.

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 2024-12-01
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-024-09640-1
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: OA PDF Hybrid
Topics: argument
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓

Barker, J.A. 1976. The fallacy of begging the question. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canad…

↗
F van Eemeren (2002)

Argumentation: analysis, evaluation, presentation

↗
Gentzen, G. 1934. Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. i. Mathematische Zeitschrift 39(2):176–210

↗
Gentzen, G. 1935. Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. ii. Mathematische Zeitschrift 39(3):405–431

↗
JA van Laar (2011)

Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics

↗
JD Mackenzie (1980)

Mackenzie, J.D. 1980. Why do we number theorems? Austrlasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (2): 135.

Austrlasian Journal of Philosophy ↗
C Reed (2007)

Reed, C., D. Walton, and F. Macagno. 2007. Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. Th…

The Knowledge Engineering Review ↗
R Robinson (1971)

Robinson, R. 1971. Begging the question. Analysis 31 (4): 113–117.

Analysis ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Going Around in Circles

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

Cites in this index (0)

Related Articles