Argumentation Dec 2024 Open Access

Going Around in Circles

Barteld Kooi University of Groningen

Abstract

AbstractThis paper tries to reconcile the clash between argumentation theory and formal logic regarding circular arguments, which are regarded as the fallacy of begging the question by the former, and a benign and useful inference pattern by the latter. This paper provides a formal system which can represent circular arguments found in the literature. The formal system makes it possible to distinguish two ways in which arguments can be circular. The first type of circularity, which is vicious, is when an argument is based on an inference step which is (indirectly) supported by that inference step itself. The second kind of circularity, which is benign, occurs when one of the premises is the same proposition as the conclusion. The first type of circularity implies the second type of circularity, but not the other way round. This distinction is in line with other approaches to circular arguments. Analyzing selected examples from the literature shows the value of the formal system.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-024-09640-1
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (24)

  1. C Allen (2001)
    Logic Primer
  2. Aristotle. 1989. Prior Analytics / translated, with introduction, notes, and commentary by Robin Smith. India…
  3. Barker, J.A. 1976. The fallacy of begging the question. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canad…
     ↗
  4. Barker-Plummer, D., J. Barwise, and Etchemendy J. 2011. Language, Proof, and Logic, 2nd edn. CSLI Publication…
  5. EW Beth (1959)
    A study in the philosophy of science
Show all 24 →
  1. Brotherston, J. 2006. Sequent calculus proof systems for inductive definitions. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh
  2. F van Eemeren (2002)
    Argumentation: analysis, evaluation, presentation
     ↗
  3. A Fisher (1988)
    The Logic of Real Arguments
  4. FB Fitch (1952)
    Symbolic logic: An introduction
  5. JB Freeman (1991)
    Dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments, studies of argumentation in pragmatics an…
  6. Gentzen, G. 1934. Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. i. Mathematische Zeitschrift 39(2):176–210
     ↗
  7. Gentzen, G. 1935. Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. ii. Mathematische Zeitschrift 39(3):405–431
     ↗
  8. H Hansen (2018)
    The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, summer
  9. H Hansen (2020)
    The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, summer
  10. D Jacquette (1993)
    Jacquette, D. 1993. Logical dimensions of question-begging argument. American Philosophical Quarterly 30 (4):…
    American Philosophical Quarterly
  11. JA van Laar (2011)
    Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics
     ↗
  12. EJ Lemmon (1965)
    Beginning Logic
  13. JD Mackenzie (1980)
    Mackenzie, J.D. 1980. Why do we number theorems? Austrlasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (2): 135.
    Austrlasian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  14. C Reed (2007)
    Reed, C., D. Walton, and F. Macagno. 2007. Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence. Th…
    The Knowledge Engineering Review  ↗
  15. R Robinson (1971)
    Robinson, R. 1971. Begging the question. Analysis 31 (4): 113–117.
    Analysis  ↗
  16. PF Strawson (1952)
    Introduction to Logical Theory
  17. DN Walton (1989)
    Informal logic: A handbook for critical argumentation
  18. DN Walton (1991)
    Begging the question: Circular reasoning as a tactic of argumentation
  19. Walton, D.N. 1995. The essential ingredients of the fallacy of begging the question. In: Hansen HV, Pinto RC …
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Argumentation Apr 2026
    A Normative Pragmatic Inquiry into the Volatility of Norms in Argumentation ↗
    Sally Jackson
    discourse analysis argument qualitative research public rhetoric
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026
    Book Review: Environmental Preservation and the Grey Cliffs Conflict: Negotiating Common Narratives, Values, and Ethos PickeringK. (2024). Environmental Preservation and the Grey Cliffs Conflict: Negotiating Common Narratives, Values, and Ethos. Utah State University Press, 268 pp. ↗
    Mia Twomey
    argument book reviews
  3. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  4. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Associations of adolescents’ argumentative writing scores and growth when evaluated by different human raters and artificial intelligence models ↗
    Deborah K. Reed; Sterett Mercer
    argument artificial intelligence
  5. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Apr 2026
    Psyche or Soma?: An Analysis of the Medical Debates Over the Diagnosis and Treatment of “Transsexualism” ↗
    Samantha Rippetoe
    rhetorical criticism argument archival research