Argumentation Jun 2024 Open Access

Bootstrapping and Persuasive Argumentation

Guido Melchior University of Graz

Abstract

AbstractThat bootstrapping and Moorean reasoning fail to instantiate persuasive argumentation is an often informally presented but not systematically developed view. In this paper, I will argue that this unpersuasiveness is not determined by principles of justification transmission but by two straightforward principles of rationality, understood as a concept of internal coherence. First, it is rational for S to believe the conclusion of an argument because of the argument, only if S believes sufficiently many premises of the argument. Second, if S doubts that a source O is reliable and believes that information i is delivered by O, then S rationally suspends judgment about the truth of i. This paper aims to accomplish two tasks. First, it provides a thorough analysis of why bootstrapping argumentation is not an instance of rational persuasion. Second, it contains a more general theory about preconditions and limits of persuasive argumentation.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2024-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-023-09627-4
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
argument
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (52) · 2 in this index

  1. William P Alston (1986)
    Alston, William P. 1986. Epistemic circularity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47: 1–30.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  ↗
  2. William P Alston (1993)
    The reliability of sense perception
  3. John Biro (2006)
    Biro, John, and Harvey Siegel. 2006. In defense of the objective epistemic approach to argumentation. Informa…
    Informal Logic  ↗
  4. John Broome (2005)
    Broome, John. 2005. Wide or narrow scope? Mind 116: 359–370.
    Mind  ↗
  5. Stewart Cohen (2002)
    Cohen, Stewart. 2002. Basic knowledge and the problem of easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Rese…
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  ↗
Show all 52 →
  1. Stewart Cohen (2005)
    Cohen, Stewart. 2005. Why basic knowledge is easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):…
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  ↗
  2. Martin Davies (2004)
    Davies, Martin. 2004. Epistemic entitlement, warrant transmission and easy knowledge. Aristotelian Society Su…
    Aristotelian Society Supplementary  ↗
  3. Dutilh Novaes Catarina (2016)
    Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2016. Reductio ad absurdum from a dialogical perspective. Philosophical Studies 173 …
    Philosophical Studies  ↗
  4. Frans H van Eemeren (1984)
    Speech acts in argumentative discussions. A theoretical model for the analysis of discuss…
     ↗
  5. Frans H van Eemeren (1992)
    Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective
  6. Frans H van Eemeren (2004)
    A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach
  7. Frans H van Eemeren (2014)
    Handbook of argumentation theory
     ↗
  8. Paul Faulkner (2011)
    Knowledge on trust
     ↗
  9. Richard Feldman (1994)
    Socializing epistemology. The social dimensions of knowledge
  10. Richard Feldman (1999)
    Reason and argument
  11. Fogelin Robert (1985)
    Fogelin, Robert. 1985. The logic of deep disagreements. Informal Logic 7: 1–8.
    Informal Logic
  12. James B Freeman (2005)
    Acceptable premises: An epistemic approach to an informal logic problem
  13. David M Godden (2010)
    Godden, David M. 2010. The importance of belief in argumentation: Belief, commitment and the effective resolu…
    Synthese  ↗
  14. Alvin I Goldman (1994)
    Goldman, Alvin I. 1994. Argumentation and social epistemology. Journal of Philosophy 91: 27–49.
    Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  15. Alvin I Goldman (1999)
    Knowledge in a social world
     ↗
  16. Leo Groarke (2016)
    Groarke, Leo, Catherine Palczewski, and David Godden. 2016. Navigating the visual turn in argument. Argumenta…
    Argumentation and Advocacy  ↗
  17. Jesper Kallestrup (2020)
    Kallestrup, Jesper. 2020. The epistemology of testimonal trust. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101 …
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  ↗
  18. Peter Klein (1981)
    Certainty: A refutation of skepticism
  19. Niko Kolodny (2005)
    Kolodny, Niko. 2005. Why be rational? Mind 114: 509–563.
    Mind  ↗
  20. Jennifer Lackey (2008)
    Learning from words: Testimony as a source of knowledge
     ↗
  21. Keith Lehrer (1990)
    Theory of knowledge
  22. Christoph Lumer (2005)
    Lumer, Christoph. 2005. The epistemological approach to argumentation—A map. Informal Logic 25: 189–212.
    Informal Logic  ↗
  23. Lynch Michael (2010)
    Social epistemology
     ↗
  24. Lynch Michael (2016)
    Lynch, Michael. 2016. After the spade turns: Disagreement, first principles and epistemic contractarianism. I…
    International Journal for the Study of Skepticism  ↗
  25. Peter Markie (2005)
    Markie, Peter. 2005. Easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2): 406–416.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  ↗
  26. Guido Melchior (2016)
    Melchior, Guido. 2016. Easy knowledge, closure failure or skepticism: A trilemma. Metaphilosophy 47 (2): 214–232.
    Metaphilosophy  ↗
  27. Guido Melchior (2020)
    Melchior, Guido. 2020. The persuasiveness puzzle about bootstrapping. Ratio 33 (1): 27–36.
    Ratio  ↗
  28. Guido Melchior (2023)
    Melchior, Guido. 2023a. Skeptical arguments and deep disagreement. Erkenntnis 88 (5): 1869–1893.
    Erkenntnis  ↗
  29. Guido Melchior (2023)
    Melchior, Guido. 2023b. Rationally irresolvable disagreement. Philosophical Studies 180 (4): 1277–1304.
    Philosophical Studies  ↗
  30. George E Moore (1959)
    Certainty. Philosophical papers
  31. Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Indiana: Un…
  32. Josef Perner (1991)
    Understanding the representational mind
  33. John Pollock (1986)
    Contemporary theories of knowledge
  34. James Pryor (2004)
    Pryor, James. 2004. What’s wrong with Moore’s argument? Philosophical Issues 14 (1): 349–378.
    Philosophical Issues  ↗
  35. James Pryor (2012)
    Mind, meaning, and knowledge: Themes from the philosophy of crispin wright
     ↗
  36. Ranalli Christopher (2020)
    Ranalli, Christopher. 2020. Deep disagreement and hinge epistemology. Synthese 197: 4975–5007.
    Synthese  ↗
  37. Ranalli Christopher (2022)
    Ranalli, Christopher, and Thirza Lagewaard. 2022a. Deep disagreement (part 1): Theories of deep disagreement.…
    Philosophy Compass
  38. Ranalli Christopher (2022)
    Ranalli, Christopher, and Thirza Lagewaard. 2022b. Deep disagreement (part 2): Epistemology of deep disagreem…
    Philosophy Compass
  39. Siegel et al. (1997)
    Epistemic Normativity, Argumentation, and Fallacies
    Argumentation
  40. Siegel et al. (2008)
    Rationality, Reasonableness, and Critical Rationalism: Problems with the Pragma…
    Argumentation
  41. Smith Simard Paul (2020)
    Simard Smith, Paul, and Lynch Michael. 2020. Varieties of deep epistemic disagreement. Topoi 40: 971–982.
    Topoi  ↗
  42. Jonathan Vogel (2000)
    Vogel, Jonathan. 2000. Reliabilism levelled. Journal of Philosophy 97 (11): 602–623.
    Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  43. Jonathan Vogel (2008)
    Vogel, Jonathan. 2008. Epistemic bootstrapping. Journal of Philosophy 105 (9): 518–539.
    Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  44. Mark Vorobej (2006)
    A theory of argument
     ↗
  45. Douglas Walton (2006)
    Fundamentals of critical argumentation
  46. Douglas Walton (2013)
    Methods of argumentation
     ↗
  47. Jonathan Weisberg (2012)
    Weisberg, Jonathan. 2012. The bootstrapping problem. Philosophy Compass 7 (9): 597–610.
    Philosophy Compass  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Argumentation Apr 2026
    A Normative Pragmatic Inquiry into the Volatility of Norms in Argumentation ↗
    Sally Jackson
    discourse analysis argument qualitative research public rhetoric
  2. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly Apr 2026
    Book Review: Environmental Preservation and the Grey Cliffs Conflict: Negotiating Common Narratives, Values, and Ethos PickeringK. (2024). Environmental Preservation and the Grey Cliffs Conflict: Negotiating Common Narratives, Values, and Ethos. Utah State University Press, 268 pp. ↗
    Mia Twomey
    argument book reviews
  3. Res Rhetorica Apr 2026
    Logos in ancient Greek discourse on rhetoric: An overview ↗
    Arkadiusz Sokolnicki
    classical rhetoric rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument
  4. Assessing Writing Apr 2026
    Associations of adolescents’ argumentative writing scores and growth when evaluated by different human raters and artificial intelligence models ↗
    Deborah K. Reed; Sterett Mercer
    argument artificial intelligence
  5. Rhetoric of Health and Medicine Apr 2026
    Psyche or Soma?: An Analysis of the Medical Debates Over the Diagnosis and Treatment of “Transsexualism” ↗
    Samantha Rippetoe
    rhetorical criticism argument archival research