Argumentation Mar 2024 Open Access

It’s not (only) about Getting the Last Word: Rhetorical Norms of Public Argumentation and the Responsibility to Keep the Conversation Going

Mette Bengtsson University of Copenhagen ; Lisa Villadsen

Abstract

AbstractThe core function of argumentation in a democratic setting must be to constitute a modality for citizens to engage differences of opinion constructively – for the present but also in future exchanges. To enable this function requires acceptance of the basic conditions of public debate: that consensus is often an illusory goal which should be replaced by better mastery of living with dissent and compromise. Furthermore, it calls for an understanding of the complexity of real-life public debate which is an intermixture of claims of fact, definition, value, and policy, each of which calls for an awareness of the greater ‘debate environment’ of which particular deliberative exchanges are part. We introduce a rhetorical meta-norm as an evaluation criterion for public debate. In continuation of previous scholarship concerned with how to create room for differences of opinion and how to foster a sustainable debate culture, we work from a civically oriented conception of rhetoric. This conception is less instrumental and more concerned with the role of communication in public life and the maintenance of the democratic state. A rhetorical meta-norm of public argumentation is useful when evaluating public argumentation – not as the only norm, but integrated with specific norms from rhetoric, pragma-dialectics, and formal logic. We contextualise our claims through an example of authentic contemporary public argumentation: a debate over a biogas generator in rural Denmark.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2024-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-023-09622-9
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
rhetorical criticism argument assessment public rhetoric
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (27) · 2 in this index

  1. Aikin, Scott F. and Robert B. Talisse. ​​2014. In Why we argue (and how we should): a guide to political disa…
     ↗
  2. Danielle Allen (2004)
    Talking to strangers: anxieties of citizenship since Brown V. Board of Education
     ↗
  3. Aristotle. 2006. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. 2nd ed., translated with introduction, notes and a…
  4. Black, E. (1970). The second persona. Quarterly Journal of Speech 56(2):109–119.
     ↗
  5. Wayne Brockriede (1960)
    Brockriede, Wayne, Douglas Ehninger. 1960. Toulmin on argument: an interpretation and application. Quarterly …
    Quarterly Journal of Speech  ↗
Show all 27 →
  1. Marcus T Cicero (2011)
    De Oratore Book III
  2. F Cooke, Elizabeth (2004)
    Cooke, Elizabeth, F. 2004. Rorty on Conversation as an achievement of Hope. Contemporary Pragmatism 1(1): 83–102.
    Contemporary Pragmatism  ↗
  3. Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2006. Fem misforståelser om casestudiet. In Kvalitative metoder, eds. Svend Brinkmann and Le…
  4. Goodnight (1993)
    A ?new rhetoric? for a ?new dialectic?: Prolegomena to a responsible public argument
    Argumentation
  5. Robert Ivie (2002)
    Ivie, Robert. 2002. Rhetorical deliberation and Democratic Politics in the Here and now. Rhetoric & Public Af…
    Rhetoric & Public Affairs  ↗
  6. Jim Jasinski (2001)
    Sourcebook on Rhetoric
  7. Charlotte Jørgensen (2000)
    Jørgensen, Charlotte. 2000. Hvem Bestemmer Hvad Der er god retorik? Vurderingsinstanser i normativ retorik. R…
    Rhetorica Scandinvica  ↗
  8. Charlotte Jørgensen (2011)
    Retorik Der Flytter Stemmer: Hvordan man overbeviser i offentlig debat
     ↗
  9. Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Jane Mansbridge. 2005. Disagreement and Consensus: The Need for Dynamic Updati…
     ↗
  10. Kinder, Peter D. 2022. Not in My Backyard Phenomenon. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/top…
  11. Christian Kock (2007)
    Kock, Christian. 2007. Dialectical obligations in political debate. Informal Logic 27(3): 233–247.
    Informal Logic
  12. Kock (2009)
    Choice is Not True or False: The Domain of Rhetorical Argumentation
    Argumentation
  13. Christian Kock (2013)
    De Svarer ikke. Fordummende uskikke i den politiske debat
  14. Christian Kock (2017)
    Deliberative rhetoric: arguing about doing
     ↗
  15. Mansbridge, Jane. 2018. Participation, Deliberation, Legitimate Coercion. Edited by Melissa Williams. London:…
  16. Diana C Mutz (2006)
    Hearing the other side: deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
     ↗
  17. Perelman (1958)
    Traité De L’argumentation: La Nouvelle rhétorique
  18. Quintilian. 1921/1922. The Institutio oratoria of Quintilian. London: New York: W. Heinemann; G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
  19. John Rawls (1971)
    A theory of Justice
     ↗
  20. Karen Tracy (2010)
    Challenges of ordinary Democracy: a case study in deliberation and dissent
  21. Frans H van Eemeren (1999)
    van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser. 1999. Strategic Maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Discourse St…
    Discourse Studies  ↗
  22. Frans H van Eemeren (2004)
    A systematic theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Sep 2024
    For the Enjoyment of the People: The Creation of National Identity in American Public Lands ↗
    Kyra Bowar
    rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument assessment public rhetoric affect and writing
  2. Rhetoric & Public Affairs Mar 2023
    Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates ↗
    Divine N. Aboagye
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument assessment race and writing public rhetoric affect and writing
  3. Philosophy & Rhetoric Jun 2022
    Market Affect and the Rhetoric of Political Economic Debates ↗
    Robert McDonald
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism african american rhetorics argument assessment public rhetoric affect and writing body and rhetoric
  4. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  5. Philosophy & Rhetoric Nov 2020
    Rhetoric and Demagoguery ↗
    Fielding Montgomery
    classical rhetoric modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism discourse analysis argument assessment qualitative research gender and writing public rhetoric