Questions, Presuppositions and Fallacies

Andrei Moldovan Universidad de Salamanca

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper I focus on the fallacy known as Complex Question or Many Questions. After a brief introduction, in Sect. 2 I highlight its pragmatic dimension, and in Sect. 3 its dialectical dimension. In Sect. 4 I present two accounts of this fallacy developed in argumentation theory, Douglas Walton’s and the Pragma-Dialectics’, which have resources to capture both its pragmatic and its dialectical nature. However, these accounts are unsatisfactory for various reasons. In Sect. 5 I focus on the pragmatic dimension of the fallacy and I suggest amendments to the accounts mentioned drawing on the study of the phenomenon of presupposition in theoretical pragmatics. I argue that the central notion in the definition of the fallacy is that of an informative presupposition. In Sect. 6 I focus on the dialectical dimension of the fallacy. This dimension needs to be explicitly acknowledged in the definition of the fallacy in order to distinguish it from a different, non-dialectical, fallacious argumentative move involving presuppositions.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2022-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-022-09566-6
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

References (60) · 5 in this index

  1. Abbott, Barbara. 2006. Where have some of the presuppositions gone? In Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo…
  2. A new approach to the logical theory of interrogatives
  3. Giving Reasons. A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory
  4. Bermejo-Luque, L. 2015. Giving Reasons Does Not Always Amount to Arguing. Topoi: 1–10.
  5. Bobzien, Susanne. 2012. How to give someone Horns. Paradoxes of Presupposition in Antiquity. Logical Analysis…
    Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy  
Show all 60 →
  1. Braun, David. 2011. Implicating Questions. Mind and Language 26 (5): 574–595.
    Mind and Language  
  2. Caffi, Claudia. 2006. Pragmatic presupposition. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. Keith Brown,…
  3. Chierchia, Gennaro and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1990. Meaning and Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  4. Copi, Irving M., Carl Cohen and Kenneth McMahon. 2013. Introduction to Logic. Pearson New International Edition.
  5. Cross, Charles and Floris Roelofsen. 2020. Questions. In ed. Edward N. Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Ph…
  6. Galindo Castañeda, Joaquín. 2017. Las preguntas en la teoría de la argumentación. Revista Iberoamericana de A…
    Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación  
  7. García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2018. On the Nature of Presupposition: A Normative Speech Act Account. Erkenntnis …
    Erkenntnis  
  8. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions
  9. van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Diale…
  10. van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation - The pragma-dialectica…
  11. van Eemeren, Frans H. 2013. Fallacies as derailments of argumentative discourse: Acceptance based on understa…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  12. van Eemeren, Frans H. 2015. Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Argumentation Librar…
  13. Fair, Frank (1973). The Fallacy of Many Questions: Or, How to Stop Beating Your Wife. The Southernwestern Jou…
  14. Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Uber Sinn und Bedeutung. In Zeitschrift fur Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 25–5…
  15. Greco, Sara. 2003. When presupposing becomes dangerous. How the procedure of presuppositional accommodation c…
    Studies in Communication Sciences
  16. Green, Mitchell. 2017. Conversation and common ground. Philosophical Studies 174 (6): 1587–1604.
    Philosophical Studies  
  17. Hamblin, Charles L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen
  18. Argumentation
  19. Argumentation
  20. Hoinărescu, Liliana. 2015. Construction of identity and the rhetoric of lying in Romanian political discourse…
  21. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language
  22. Ilie, Cornelia. 1999. Question–response argumentation in talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 31 (8): 975–999. D…
    Journal of Pragmatics  
  23. What else can I tell you? A pragmatic study of English rhetorical questions as discursive…
  24. Ilie, Cornelia. 2015. Questions and questioning. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Int…
  25. Argumentation
  26. Johnson, Ralph H. 1989. Massey on fallacy and informal logic: A reply. Synthese 80 (3): 407–426.
    Synthese  
  27. Johnson, Ralph and J. Anthony Blair. 1994. Logical Self-defense. International Debate Education Association.
  28. Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument
  29. Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus
  30. Kopytowska, Monika. 2010. Unveiling the Other—the Pragmatics of Infosuasion. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6.2: 2…
    Lodz Papers in Pragmatics  
  31. Langton, Rae. 2018. The Authority of Hate Speech. In eds. John Gardner, Leslie Green, and Brian Leiter. Oxfor…
  32. Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1): 339–359.
    Journal of Philosophical Logic  
  33. Lotze, Nathaniel. 2019. Invited presuppositions and the pragmatics of trick questions. International Review o…
    International Review of Pragmatics  
  34. Marraud, Hubert. 2018. Prácticas lingüísticas y prácticas argumentativas. In Perspectivas sobre el significad…
  35. Mazid, Bahaa-eddin. 2007. Presuppositions and strategic functions in Bush’s 20/9/2001 speech: A critical disc…
    Journal of Language and Politics  
  36. Argumentation
  37. Pilgram, Roosmaryn, and Leah E. Polcar. 2007. Questioning the fallacy of many questions. In eds. Frans H. van…
  38. Sadock, Jarold. 1971. Queclaratives. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society  7: …
  39. Sbisà, Marina. 1999. Ideology and the Peruasive Use of Presupposition. In J. Verschueren ed., Language and Id…
  40. Searle, John R. 1975. A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. In K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge. …
  41. Seuren, Pieter, A. M. 2000. Presupposition, negation and trivalence. Journal of Linguistics 36: 261–297.
    Journal of Linguistics  
  42. Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-cultural Perspectives
  43. Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic Presuppositions. In eds. M. Munitz and P. Unger, Semantics and Philosophy,…
  44. Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5–6): 701–721.
    Linguistics and Philosophy  
  45. The Uses of Argument
  46. Walton, Douglas. 1981. The fallacy of many questions. Logique et Analyse 95/96: 291–313.
    Logique et Analyse
  47. Question-Reply Argumentation
  48. A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy
  49. Walton, Douglas. 1997. Judging How Heavily a Question is Loaded: A Pragmatic Method. Inquiry: Critical Thinki…
    Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines
  50. Argumentation
  51. Walton, Douglas. 2006. Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
  52. Walton, Douglas. 2010. Why Fallacies Appear to be Better Arguments Than They Are. Informal Logic 30 (2): 159–184.
    Informal Logic  
  53. Walton, Douglas. 2013. Methods of Argumentation. Cambridge University Press.
  54. Wodak, Ruth. 2007. Pragmatics and critical discourse analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry. Pragmatics and C…
    Pragmatics and Cognition  
  55. Argument: Critical Thinking, Logic, and the Fallacies