Argumentation Theory for Mathematical Argument

Joseph Corneli University of Edinburgh ; Ursula Martin University of Oxford ; Dave Murray-Rust Edinburgh College ; Gabriela Rino Nesin University of Brighton ; Alison Pease University of Dundee

Abstract

To adequately model mathematical arguments the analyst must be able to represent the mathematical objects under discussion and the relationships between them, as well as inferences drawn about these objects and relationships as the discourse unfolds. We introduce a framework with these properties, which has been used to analyse mathematical dialogues and expository texts. The framework can recover salient elements of discourse at, and within, the sentence level, as well as the way mathematical content connects to form larger argumentative structures. We show how the framework might be used to support computational reasoning, and argue that it provides a more natural way to examine the process of proving theorems than do Lamport’s structured proofs.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2019-06-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-018-9474-x
CompPile
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (96) · 2 in this index

  1. The argument of mathematics
  2. Aliseda, A. 2003. Mathematical reasoning versus abductive reasoning: a structural approach. Synthese 134(1–2)…
    Synthese  
  3. Barany, M. 2010. ‘[B]ut this is blog maths and we’re free to make up conventions as we go along’: Polymath1 a…
  4. Botting, D. 2015. Inferences and illocutions. Argument & Computation 6(3): 246–264.
    Argument & Computation  
  5. Bringsjord, S., J. Taylor, A. Shilliday, M. Clark, K. Arkoudas, M. Schoelles, M. Destefano, and J. Wodicka. 2…
Show all 96 →
  1. Budzynska, K. 2013. Circularity in ethotic structures. Synthese 190(15): 3185–3207.
    Synthese  
  2. Budzynska, K., and C. Reed. 2011. Speech acts of argumentation: inference anchors and peripheral cues in dial…
  3. Budzynska, K., M. Janier, C. Reed, and P. Saint-Dizier. 2013. Towards extraction of dialogical arguments. In …
  4. Budzynska, K., M. Janier, J. Kang, C. Reed, P. Saint-Dizier, M. Stede, and O. Yaskorska. 2014a. Towards argum…
  5. Budzynska, K., M. Janier, C. Reed, P. Saint-Dizier, M. Stede, and O. Yaskorska. 2014b. A model for processing…
  6. Budzynska, K., M. Janier, J. Kang, B. Konat, C. Reed, P. Saint-Dizier, M. Stede, and O. Yaskorska. 2015. Auto…
  7. Budzynska, K., M. Janier, C. Reed, and P. Saint-Dizier. 2016. Theoretical foundations for illocutionary struc…
    Argument & Computation  
  8. Bundy, A. 1988. The use of explicit plans to guide inductive proofs. In Lusk E, Overbeek R (eds) 9th Internat…
  9. Bundy, A. 2013. The interaction of representation and reasoning. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A…
  10. Argumentation
  11. Chandrasekhar, et al. 2010. Group cannot be the union of conjugates. http://mathoverflow.net/q/34044 .
  12. Corneli, J., U. Martin, D. Murray-Rust, and A. Pease. 2017a. Towards mathematical AI via a model of the conte…
  13. Corneli, J., U. Martin, D. Murray-Rust, A. Pease, R. Puzio, and G. Rino Nesin. 2017b. Modelling the way mathe…
  14. Corneli, J., A. Pease, and D. Stefanou. 2018. Social aspects of concept invention. In Concept invention: foun…
  15. Cramer, M. 2013. Proof-checking mathematical texts in controlled natural language. Ph.D. thesis, Mathematisch…
  16. Dauphin, J., and M. Cramer. 2018. ASPIC-END: structured argumentation with explanations and natural deduction…
  17. Dove, I.J. 2009. Towards a theory of mathematical argument. Foundations of Science 14(1–2): 137–152.
    Foundations of Science  
  18. The argument of mathematics
  19. Dutilh Novaes, C. 2016. Reductio ad absurdum from a dialogical perspective. Philosophical Studies 173(10): 26…
    Philosophical Studies  
  20. Epstein, S.L. 2015. Wanted: collaborative intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 221: 36–45.
    Artificial Intelligence  
  21. Rhetorical figures in science
  22. Fahnestock, J. 2004. Figures of argument (OSSA 2005 Keynote Address). Informal Logic 24(2).
  23. Fiedler, A., and H. Horacek. 2007. Argumentation within deductive reasoning. International Journal of Intelli…
    International Journal of Intelligent Systems  
  24. Furse, E. 1990. Why did AM run out of steam? Tech. rep., CS-90-4, Department of Computer Studies, University …
  25. Ganesalingam, M. 2013. The language of mathematics: a linguistic and philosophical investigation, LNCS, vol 7…
  26. Ganesalingam, M., and W. Gowers. 2017. A fully automatic theorem prover with human-style output. Journal of A…
    Journal of Automated Reasoning  
  27. On the shape of mathematical arguments
    Lecture Notes in Computer Science  
  28. Ginev, D. 2011. The structure of mathematical expressions. Master’s thesis. Bremen, Germany: Jacobs University.
  29. Gowers, W. 2017. How do human mathematicians avoid big searches? https://www.newton.ac.uk/seminar/20170728133…
  30. Gowers, W., and M. Ganesalingam. 2012. Modelling the mathematical discovery process. Maxwell Institute Lectur…
  31. Groth, P., and L. Moreau. 2013. PROV-overview. An overview of the PROV family of documents. In World Wide Web…
  32. Advances in semantic authoring and publishing, Studies on the Semantic Web
  33. Harris, R., and C. D. Marco. 2017. Argument & Computation 8(3) [Special Issue on Rhetorical figures, argument…
  34. Hayes, P. 2006. IKL guide. http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/IKL/GUIDE/GUIDE.html .
  35. Hendrix, GG. 1975. Partitioned networks for the mathematical modeling of natural language semantics. Ph.D. th…
  36. Associative networks: representation and use of knowledge by computers
  37. Hersh, R. 1991. Mathematics has a front and a back. Synthese 88(2): 127–133.
    Synthese  
  38. Iancu, M. 2017. Towards flexiformal mathematics. Ph.D. thesis, Jacobs University, Bremen, DE.
  39. Inglis, M., J.P. Mejia-Ramos, and A. Simpson. 2007. Modelling mathematical argumentation: the importance of q…
    Educational Studies in Mathematics  
  40. Argumentation
  41. Kamp, H., and U. Reyle. 1993. From discourse to logic introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural lan…
  42. Karttunen, L. 1976. Discourse referents. In Syntax and semantics, vol 7, ed. J.D. McCawley. Notes from the Li…
  43. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology
  44. Kohlhase, M. 2012. The flexiformalist manifesto. In Voronkov A, Negru V, Ida T, Jebelean T, Petcu D, Watt S, …
  45. Kohlhase, M., T. Koprucki, D. Müller, and K. Tabelow. 2017. Mathematical models as research data via flexifor…
  46. Proofs and refutations: the logic of mathematical discovery
  47. Lamport, L. 1995. How to write a proof. The American Mathematical Monthly 102(7): 600–608.
    The American Mathematical Monthly  
  48. Lamport, L. 1999. Specifying concurrent systems with TLA $$^{+}$$ + . NATO Science Series, III: Computer and …
    NATO Science Series, III: Computer and Systems Sciences
  49. Lamport, L. 2012. How to write a 21st century proof. Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications 11(1): 43–63.
    Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications  
  50. Lamport, L. 2014. TLA $$^{+2}$$ + 2 : a preliminary guide. http://lamport.azurewebsites.net/tla/tla2-guide.pdf .
  51. Lamport, L. 2015. The TLA $$^{+}$$ + hyperbook. http://lamport.azurewebsites.net/tla/hyperbook.html .
  52. Larvor, B. 2012. How to think about informal proofs. Synthese 187(2): 715–730.
    Synthese  
  53. Lawrence, J., F. Bex, C. Reed, and M. Snaith. 2012. AIFdb: infrastructure for the argument web. In Verheij B,…
  54. Lawrence, J., J. Visser, and C. Reed. 2017. Harnessing rhetorical figures for argument mining. Argument & Com…
    Argument & Computation  
  55. Maghraby, A., D. Robertson, A. Grando, and M. Rovatsos. 2012. Automated deployment of argumentation protocols…
  56. Automated deduction—CADE-25
  57. Martin, U., and A. Pease. 2013. What does mathoverflow tell us about the production of mathematics? In Novak …
  58. Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral an…
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences  
  59. Mitrović, J., C. OReilly, M. Mladenović, and S. Handschuh. 2017. Ontological representations of rhetorical fi…
    Argument & Computation  
  60. Modgil, S., and J. McGinnis. 2007. Towards characterising argumentation based dialogue in the argument interc…
  61. Moens, M. F. 2018. Argumentation mining: How can a machine acquire common sense and world knowledge? Argument…
  62. National Research Council. 2014. Developing a 21st century global library for mathematics research. National …
  63. Nielsen, M. et al. 2009–2018. Polymath wiki. http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php?title=Main_Page .
  64. Pease, A., and U. Martin. 2012. Seventy four minutes of mathematics: an analysis of the third Mini-Polymath p…
  65. Pease, A., A. Smaill, S. Colton, and J. Lee. 2009. Bridging the gap between argumentation theory and the phil…
    Foundations of Science  
  66. Pease, A., J. Lawrence, K. Budzynska, J. Corneli, and C. Reed. 2017. Lakatos-style collaborative mathematics …
  67. Pedemonte, B. 2007. How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies…
    Educational Studies in Mathematics  
  68. Reed, C., and K. Budzynska. 2010. How dialogues create arguments. In van Eemeren F, Garssen B, Godden D and M…
  69. Reed, C., K. Budzynska, R. Duthie, M. Janier, B. Konat, J. Lawrence, A. Pease, and M. Snaith. 2017. The argum…
    Philosophy & Technology  
  70. Robertson, D. 2012. Lightweight coordination calculus for agent systems: retrospective and prospective. Sprin…
  71. Robinson, J.A. 1965. A machine-oriented logic based on the resolution principle. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 12…
    Journal of the ACM (JACM)  
  72. Saint-Dizier, P. 2016. Argument mining: the bottleneck of knowledge and language resources. In Calzolari N, C…
  73. Snaith, M., and C. Reed. 2012. TOAST: online ASPIC+ implementation. In Verheij B, Szeider S, and Woltran S (e…
  74. Snaith, M., and C. Reed. 2016. Dialogue grammar induction. In Mohammed D and Lewinski M (eds) Argumentation a…
  75. Snaith, M., J. Devereux, J. Lawrence, and C. Reed. 2010. Pipelining argumentation technologies. In Baroni P, …
  76. Sowa, J. F. 2000. Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. MIT Press
  77. Sowa, J. F. 2008. Conceptual graphs. In Handbook of knowledge representation, ed. van Harmelen F, Lifschitz V…
  78. Sowa, J. F., and A. K. Majumdar. 2003. Analogical reasoning. In Aldo A, Lex W, and Ganter B (eds) Conceptual …
  79. Tanswell, F. 2015. A problem with the dependence of informal proofs on formal proofs. Philosophia Mathematica…
    Philosophia Mathematica  
  80. Tao, T., et al. 2009. IMO 2009 Q6 as a mini-polymath project. https://wp.me/p3qzP-Ef .
  81. Tao, T., et al. 2011. Minipolymath3 project: 2011 IMO. https://wp.me/pAG2F-41 .
  82. Trzeciak, J. 2012. Mathematical English usage. A dictionary. http://www.emis.de/monographs/Trzeciak/biglist.html .
  83. van der Sandt, R.A. 1992. Presupposition projection as Anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9(4): 333–37…
    Journal of Semantics  
  84. van Oers, B. 2002. Fruits of polyphony: a commentary on a multiperspective analysis of mathematical discourse…
    Journal of the Learning Sciences  
  85. Visser, J., F. Bex, C. Reed, and B. Garssen. 2011. Correspondence between the pragma-dialectical discussion m…
    Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
  86. Argumentation schemes
  87. A handbook of mathematical discourse
  88. Tropics of discourse: essays in cultural criticism
  89. Wolska, M. A. 2015. Students’ language in computer-assisted tutoring of mathematical proofs. No. 40 in Saarbr…
  90. Zack, V., and B. Graves. 2001. Making mathematical meaning through dialogue: “once you think of it, the Z min…
    Educational Studies in Mathematics  
  91. Zinn, C. 2004. Understanding informal mathematical discourse. Ph.D. thesis, Institut fur Informatik, Universi…