Must a Successful Argument Convert an Ideal Audience?

Xingming Hu Nanjing University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2017-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-016-9402-x
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (20)

  1. Ballantyne, N. 2014a. Knockdown arguments. Erkenntnis 79: 525–543.
    Erkenntnis  
  2. Ballantyne, N. 2014b. Counterfactual philosophers. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88(2): 368–387.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  3. Brandt, R.B. 1955. The definition of an “ideal observer” theory in ethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Re…
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  4. The status of morality
  5. Minimal rationality
Show all 20 →
  1. Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge
  2. Firth, R. 1952. Ethical absolutism and the ideal observer. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 12(3): 317–345.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  3. Fischer, J.M., and N.A. Tognazzini. 2007. Exploring evil and philosophical failure. Faith and Philosophy 24(4…
    Faith and Philosophy  
  4. Knowledge in a social world
  5. Hanna, H. 2015. Philosophical success. Philosophical Studies 172(8): 2109–2121.
    Philosophical Studies  
  6. Moral thinking
  7. Proceedings of the second international conference on argumentation
  8. Lumer, C. 2005a. The epistemological approach to argumentation—A map. Informal Logic 25(3): 189–212.
    Informal Logic
  9. Lumer, C. 2005b. The epistemological theory of argument: How and why? Informal Logic 25(3): 214–232.
    Informal Logic
  10. McGrath, S. 2010. Moral realism without convergence. Philosophical Topics 38(2): 59–90.
    Philosophical Topics  
  11. McGrath, S., and Kelly, T. forthcoming. Are there any successful philosophical arguments? In Being, Freedom, …
  12. Plato. 1997. In Complete works. eds. Cooper, J.M., and Hutchinson, D.S. Indianapolis: Hackett.
  13. contemporary debates in applied ethics
  14. Rationality redeemed?: Further dialogues on an educational ideal
  15. The problem of evil