Argumentation Mar 2017

Must a Successful Argument Convert an Ideal Audience?

Xingming Hu Nanjing University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2017-03-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-016-9402-x
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. N Ballantyne (2014)
    Ballantyne, N. 2014a. Knockdown arguments. Erkenntnis 79: 525–543.
    Erkenntnis  ↗
  2. N Ballantyne (2014)
    Ballantyne, N. 2014b. Counterfactual philosophers. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88(2): 368–387.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  ↗
  3. RB Brandt (1955)
    Brandt, R.B. 1955. The definition of an “ideal observer” theory in ethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Re…
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  ↗
  4. T Carson (1984)
    The status of morality
     ↗
  5. R Firth (1952)
    Firth, R. 1952. Ethical absolutism and the ideal observer. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 12(3): 317–345.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  ↗
  6. JM Fischer (2007)
    Fischer, J.M., and N.A. Tognazzini. 2007. Exploring evil and philosophical failure. Faith and Philosophy 24(4…
    Faith and Philosophy  ↗
  7. Alvin I Goldman (1999)
    Knowledge in a social world
     ↗
  8. H Hanna (2015)
    Hanna, H. 2015. Philosophical success. Philosophical Studies 172(8): 2109–2121.
    Philosophical Studies  ↗
  9. RM Hare (1981)
    Moral thinking
     ↗
  10. S McGrath (2010)
    McGrath, S. 2010. Moral realism without convergence. Philosophical Topics 38(2): 59–90.
    Philosophical Topics  ↗
  11. P Inwagen van (2006)
    The problem of evil
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →