Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing

Michael H. G. Hoffmann Georgia Institute of Technology
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2016-11-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-015-9388-9
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (130) · 1 in this index

  1. Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning env…
  2. Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning env…
  3. Arnauld, A., and P. Nicole. 1996 <1683>. Logic, or, the art of thinking: Containing, besides common rules, se…
  4. Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning env…
  5. Bar-Tal, D. 2007. Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist 50: …
    American Behavioral Scientist  
Show all 130 →
  1. Belland, B.R., K.D. Glazewski, and J.C. Richardson. 2008. A scaffolding framework to support the construction…
    Educational Technology Research and Development  
  2. Blair, J.A. 2004. Argument and its uses. Informal Logic 24(2). Retrieved from http://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/ledd…
  3. Buchanan, A. 2002. Social moral epistemology. Social Philosophy & Policy 19(2): 126–152.
    Social Philosophy & Policy  
  4. Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
  5. Metacognition. Fundaments, applications, and trends: a profile of the current state-of-the-art
  6. Logic, or, the art of thinking
  7. Campitelli, G., and M. Labollita. 2010. Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices. Judg…
    Judgment and Decision Making  
  8. Dual-process theories in social psychology
  9. Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems
  10. Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL?
  11. Dillenbourg, P., and F. Hong. 2008. The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Su…
    International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning  
  12. Dillenbourg, P., and P. Tchounikine. 2007. Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative …
    Journal of Computer Assisted learning  
  13. Diogenes-Laertius. 1925. Lives of eminent philosophers. Ed. and trans. by R.D. Hicks. London, New York: W. He…
  14. Framing matters: Perspectives on negotiation research and practice in communication
  15. Metacognition
  16. Dwyer, C.P., M.J. Hogan, and I. Stewart. 2015. The effects of argument mapping-infused critical thinking inst…
    Thinking Skills and Creativity  
  17. Epstein, S. 1994. Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist 49(8): 70…
    American Psychologist  
  18. Euclid. 1956. The thirteen books of the elements. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
  19. Facione, P.A. 1990. Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment…
  20. Flavell, J.H. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. Am…
    American Psychologist  
  21. Fogelin, R. 1985. The logic of deep disagreements. Informal Logic 7: 1–8.
    Informal Logic  
  22. Frederick, S. 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(4): 25–42. …
    Journal of Economic Perspectives  
  23. Goddu, G.C. 2009. Refining Hitchcock’s definition of ‘Argument’. In Proceedings of the 8th international conf…
  24. Goldman, A.I. 1994. Argumentation and social epistemology. The Journal of Philosophy 91(1): 27–49.
    The Journal of Philosophy  
  25. Knowledge in a social world
  26. Goldman, A.I. 2003. An epistemological approach to argumentation. Informal Logic 23: 51–63.
    Informal Logic
  27. Defending science–within reason. Between scientism and cynicism
  28. Change in view: Principles of reasoning
  29. Harrell, M. 2011. Argument diagramming and critical thinking in introductory philosophy. Higher Education Res…
    Higher Education Research & Development  
  30. Harrell, M. 2012. Assessing the efficacy of argument diagramming to teach critical thinking skills in introdu…
    Inquiry
  31. Socratic epistemology: Explorations of knowledge-seeking by questioning
  32. Philosophy of logic
  33. Hoffmann, M.H.G. 2004. How to get it. Diagrammatic reasoning as a tool of knowledge development and its pragm…
    Foundations of Science  
  34. Hoffmann, M.H.G. 2005a. Logical argument mapping: A method for overcoming cognitive problems of conflict mana…
    International Journal of Conflict Management
  35. Activity and sign—grounding mathematics education
  36. Hoffmann, M.H.G. 2008. Reflective argumentation. Georgia Tech’s School of Public Policy Working Paper Series,…
  37. Hoffmann, M.H.G. 2011a. Analyzing framing processes in conflicts and communication by means of logical argume…
  38. Hoffmann, M.H.G. 2011b. Cognitive conditions of diagrammatic reasoning. Semiotica 186(1/4): 189–212.
    Semiotica
  39. Hoffmann, M.H.G. 2011c. “Theoric Transformations” and a new classification of abductive inferences. Transacti…
    Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society  
  40. Hoffmann, M.H.G. 2014a. Argument map: Developing scientific hypotheses and experimental designs in form of an…
  41. Hoffmann, M.H.G. 2014b. Argument map: Loewi’s argument that neuro-transmission works with chemical signals in…
  42. Hoffmann, M.H.G. 2014c. Hypothesis generation and testing: A template for biomedical research (argument map).…
  43. Hoffmann, M.H.G. 2015. Changing philosophy through technology: Complexity and computer-supported collaborativ…
    Philosophy & Technology  
  44. Hoffmann, M.H.G., and J. Borenstein. 2014. Understanding ill-structured engineering ethics problems through a…
    Science and Engineering Ethics  
  45. Hoffmann, M.H.G., and M. Plöger. 2000. Mathematik als Prozess der Verallgemeinerung von Zeichen: Eine exempla…
    Zeitschrift für Semiotik
  46. The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence; an essay on the constructio…
  47. Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning env…
  48. Jonassen, D.H., and Y.H. Cho. 2011. Fostering argumentation while solving engineering ethics problems. Journa…
    Journal of Engineering Education  
  49. Jonassen, D.H., and B. Kim. 2010. Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guideline…
    Educational Technology Research and Development  
  50. Jonassen, D.H., D. Shen, R.M. Marra, Y.H. Cho, J.L. Lo, and V.K. Lohani. 2009. Engaging and supporting proble…
    Journal of Engineering Education  
  51. Kahan, D.M. 2013. Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making 8(4):…
    Judgment and Decision Making  
  52. Thinking, fast and slow
  53. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment
  54. Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
  55. Kim, M., and W.-M. Roth. 2014. Argumentation as/in/for dialogical relation: A case study from elementary scho…
    Pedagogies: An International Journal  
  56. Developing reflective judgment. Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and criti…
  57. King, P.M., and K.S. Kitchener. 2004. Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemi…
    Educational Psychologist  
  58. Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
  59. Kitchener, K.S. 1983. Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition. A 3-level model of cognitive process…
    Human Development  
  60. This changes everything. Capitalism vs. the climate
  61. Kollar, I., F. Fischer, and F.W. Hesse. 2006. Collaboration scripts—a conceptual analysis. Educational Psycho…
    Educational Psychology Review  
  62. The skills of argument
  63. Kuhn, D. 1992. Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review 62(2): 155–178.
    Harvard Educational Review  
  64. Kuhn, D. 1993. Science as argument—implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Educat…
    Science Education  
  65. The structure of scientific revolutions
  66. Don’t think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate—the essential guide for…
  67. Science teaching and the development of thinking
  68. Handbook of college science teaching
  69. Leitão, S. 2000. The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development 43(6): 332–360. doi: 10.1…
    Human Development  
  70. Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts. Concepts and cases
  71. Lipstadt, D.E. 1993. Denying the Holocaust: The growing assault on truth and memory. New York; Toronto: Free …
  72. Lumer, C. 2005a. The epistemological theory of argument—How and Why? Informal Logic 25(3): 213–243.
    Informal Logic
  73. Lumer, C. 2005b. Introduction: The epistemological theory of argumentation—a map. Informal Logic 25(3): 189–212.
    Informal Logic
  74. Mazzoni, G., and T.O. Nelson. 2014. Metacognition and cognitive neuropsychology monitoring and control proces…
  75. Metacognition. Knowing about knowing
  76. Law, ontologies and the semantic web: Channelling the legal information flood
  77. Munneke, L., J. Andriessen, G. Kanselaar, and P.A. Kirschner. 2007. Supporting interactive argumentation: Inf…
    Computers in Human Behavior  
  78. Metacognition. Core readings
  79. Sustainability. A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management
  80. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco…
  81. Osborne, J. 2010. Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science 328(597…
    Science  
  82. Palus, C.J., and D.M. Horth. 2001. Putting something in the middle: An approach to dialogue. Reflections 3(2)…
    Reflections  
  83. Peirce. (CP). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Volumes I–VI, ed. by Charles Hartshorne and Paul We…
  84. Peirce. (EP). The essential Peirce. Selected philosophical writings. Vol. 1 (1867–1893), Vol. 2 (1893–1913). …
  85. Peirce. (NEM). The New Elements of Mathematics by Charles S. Peirce (Vol. I–IV). The Hague-Paris/Atlantic Hig…
  86. Metacognition. Fundaments, applications, and trends: A profile of the current state-of-the-art
  87. Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1969 <1958>. The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation. Trans. J. …
  88. Piaget, J. 1970. Genetic epistemology. Trans. E. Duckworth. New York: Columbia University Press.
  89. Recherches sur l’abstraction réfléchissante
  90. Pinto, R.C. 2001. Generalizing the notion of argument Argument, Inference and Dialectic. Collected Papers on …
  91. Argumentation
  92. Rahwan, I., F. Zablith, and C. Reed. 2007. Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web. Artificial I…
    Artificial Intelligence  
  93. Wicked problems—social messes decision support modelling with morphological analysis
  94. Rittel, H.W.J., and M.M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.
    Policy Sciences  
  95. Sampson, V., P. Enderle, J. Grooms, and S. Witte. 2013. Writing to learn by learning to write during the scho…
    Science Education  
  96. Sampson, V., J. Grooms, and J.P. Walker. 2011. Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to…
    Science Education  
  97. Sampson, V., and J.P. Walker. 2012. Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help undergraduate students write to …
    International Journal of Science Education  
  98. Frame reflection. Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies
  99. Schwarz, B.B., and R. De Groot. 2007. Argumentation in a changing world. International Journal of Computer-Su…
    International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning  
  100. Schwarz, B.B., Y. Neuman, J. Gil, and M. Ilya. 2003. Construction of collective and individual knowledge in a…
    Journal of the Learning Sciences  
  101. Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-making
  102. Sextus, E. (1912). Sexti Empirici Opera. Recensuit Hermannus Mutschmann. Vol. I, Pyrroneion Ypotyposeon. libr…
  103. Sloman, S.A. 1996. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119(1): 3–22.
    Psychological Bulletin  
  104. Rationality and the reflective mind
  105. Stanovich, K.E., and R. F. West. 2000. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality …
  106. Rationality and the reflective mind
  107. Stern, N. H. (2006). The economics of climate change. The stern review: Summary of conclusions. Retrieved fro…
  108. Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics
  109. Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning env…
  110. Suthers, D.D., and C.D. Hundhausen. 2003. An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance o…
    Journal of the Learning Sciences  
  111. Acts of arguing. A rhetorical model of argument
  112. Rhetorical argumentation: Principles of theory and practice
  113. Toplak, M.E., R.F. West, and K.E. Stanovich. 2011. The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performanc…
    Memory & Cognition  
  114. Toulmin, S. 2003 <1958>. The uses of argument (updated ed.). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
  115. U.S. Department of Education, N. C. f. E. S. 2000. The NPEC sourcebook on assessment, Volume 1: Definitions a…
  116. Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
  117. Handbook of argumentation theory
  118. A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach
  119. Veenman, M.J., B.A.M. Van Hout-Wolters, and P. Afflerbach. 2006. Metacognition and learning: conceptual and m…
    Metacognition and Learning  
  120. Thought and language
  121. Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes
  122. The concept of activity in Soviet psychology
  123. Informal logic. A handbook for critical argumentation
  124. Argumentation schemes
  125. Wenzel, J.W. 1979. Jürgen Habermas and the dialectical perspective on argumentation. Journal of the American …
    Journal of the American Forensic Association