Logically Incorrect Arguments

Vladimír Svoboda Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy ; Jaroslav Peregrin Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2016-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-015-9375-1
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 8 works outside this index ↓
  1. Carroll, L. 1895. What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind 4: 278–280.
    Mind  
  2. Jørgensen, J. 1937. Imperatives and logic. Erkenntnis 7: 288–296.
    Erkenntnis  
  3. Massey, G.J. 1975. Are there any good arguments that bad arguments are bad? Philosophy in Context 4: 61–77.
    Philosophy in Context  
  4. Massey, G.J. 1981. The fallacy behind fallacies. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6: 489–500.
    Midwest Studies in Philosophy  
  5. Peregrin, J., and V. Svoboda. 2013. Criteria for logical formalization. Synthese 190: 2897–2924.
    Synthese  
  6. Rips, L.J. 1994. The psychology of proof: deductive reasoning in human thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  7. Tarski, A. 1936. O pojeciu wynikania logicznego. Przeglad Filozoficzny 39: 58–68. English translation On the …
  8. Vranas, P.B.M. 2011. New foundations for imperative logic: Pure imperative inference. Mind 120: 369–446.
    Mind