Logically Incorrect Arguments

Vladimír Svoboda Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy ; Jaroslav Peregrin Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2016-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-015-9375-1
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (21)

  1. Bolzano, B. 1837. Wissenschaftslehre. Sulzbach: Seidel. English translation The Theory of Science, Berkeley: …
  2. Carroll, L. 1895. What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind 4: 278–280.
    Mind  
  3. The logica yearbook 2011
  4. Introduction to logic
  5. Finocchiaro, M.A. 1981. Fallacies and the evaluation of reasoning. American Philosophical Quarterly 18: 13–22.
    American Philosophical Quarterly
Show all 21 →
  1. Frege, G. 1879. Begriffsschrift. Halle: Nebert. English translation Begriffsschrift in From Frege to Gödel: A…
  2. Handbook of deontic logic and normative systems
  3. The elements of logical analysis and inference
  4. Jørgensen, J. 1937. Imperatives and logic. Erkenntnis 7: 288–296.
    Erkenntnis  
  5. Massey, G.J. 1975. Are there any good arguments that bad arguments are bad? Philosophy in Context 4: 61–77.
    Philosophy in Context  
  6. Massey, G.J. 1981. The fallacy behind fallacies. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 6: 489–500.
    Midwest Studies in Philosophy  
  7. Peregrin, J., and V. Svoboda. 2013. Criteria for logical formalization. Synthese 190: 2897–2924.
    Synthese  
  8. Peregrin, J., and V. Svoboda. (t.a.). Logical formalization and the formalization of logic(s). To appear in L…
  9. Word and object
  10. Rips, L.J. 1994. The psychology of proof: deductive reasoning in human thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  11. An introduction to formal logic
  12. Tarski, A. 1936. O pojeciu wynikania logicznego. Przeglad Filozoficzny 39: 58–68. English translation On the …
  13. Vranas, P.B.M. 2011. New foundations for imperative logic: Pure imperative inference. Mind 120: 369–446.
    Mind  
  14. Argumentation: Across the lines of discipline
  15. Fundamentals of critical argumentation
  16. Handbook of the history of logic