Citation Context
Cited by in this index (0)
No articles in this index cite this work.
References (43)
-
The book of evidence
-
Alston, W.P. 1986. Perceiving God. The Journal of Philosophy 83: 655–665.The Journal of Philosophy ↗
-
Language, truth, and logic
-
Language, truth, and logic
-
Baergen, R. 1995. Contemporary Epistemology. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Show all 43 →
-
Brock, S. 1993. Modal fictionalism: A response to Rosen. Mind 102: 147–150.Mind ↗
-
Chakravartty, A. (2013). Scientific Realism. In E. N. Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer …
-
Church, A. 1949. Review of language, truth, and logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 14: 52–53.Journal of Symbolic Logic
-
Dogan, A. 2005. Confirmation of scientific hypotheses as relations. Journal of General Philosophy of Science …Journal of General Philosophy of Science ↗
-
Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective
-
Erwin, E., and H. Siegel. 1989. Is confirmation differential? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4…British Journal for the Philosophy of Science ↗
-
Filmer, R. (1680/1991). Patriarcha and Other Writings. J. P. Sommerville (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Universi…
-
Morals by agreement
-
Gettier, E. 1963. Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis 23: 121–123.Analysis ↗
-
Grünbaum, A. 1976. Is the method of bold conjectures and attempted refutations justifiably the method of scie…British Journal for the Philosophy of Science ↗
-
Hale, B. 1995. Modal fictionalism: A simple dilemma. Analysis 55: 63–67.Analysis
-
Iranzo, V. 2007. Abduction and inference to the best explanation. Theoria 60: 339–346.Theoria
-
Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument
-
Naming and necessity
-
The structure of scientific revolutions
-
Laudan, L. 1981. A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science 48: 19–49.Philosophy of Science ↗
-
Locke, J. (1689/1988). Two Treatises of Government. P. Laslett (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Magnus, P.D. 2010. Inductions, red herrings, and the best explanation for the mixed record of science. Britis…British Journal for the Philosophy of Science ↗
-
Miller, D. 1974. Popper’s qualitative theory of verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Sci…The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science ↗
-
Mizrahi, M. 2009. Ought’ does not imply ‘can. Philosophical Frontiers 4: 19–35.Philosophical Frontiers
-
Mizrahi, M. 2012a. Why the ultimate argument for scientific realism ultimately fails. Studies in History and …Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A ↗
-
Mizrahi, M. 2012b. The pessimistic induction: A bad argument gone too far. Synthese. doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-…Synthese
-
Mizrahi, M. 2012c. Does ‘ought’ imply ‘can’ from an epistemic point of view? Philosophia 40: 829–840.Philosophia ↗
-
Muller, F.A. 2008. In defence of constructive empiricism: Maxwell’s master argument and aberrant theories. Jo…Journal for General Philosophy of Science ↗
-
Contemporary theories of knowledge
-
Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge
-
Psillos, S. 2002. Simply the best: A case for abduction. In Computational logic, ed. A. C. Kakas and F. Sadri…
-
Rationality and reality: Essays in honour of Alan Musgrave
-
Rosen, G. 1990. Modal fictionalism. Mind 99: 327–354.Mind ↗
-
Russell, B. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14: 479–493.Mind ↗
-
Introduction to mathematical philosophy
-
The analysis of knowing: A decade of research
-
Silvers, A., and L.P. Francis. 2005. Justice through trust: Disability and the outlier problem in social cont…Ethics ↗
-
Stanford, P. K. (2006). Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. O…
-
Tichý, P. 1974. On Popper’s definitions of verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science …The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science ↗
-
Turri, J. 2011. Manifest failure: The Gettier problem solved. Philosophers’ Imprint 11: 1–11.Philosophers’ Imprint
-
The scientific image
-
Van Fraassen, B.C. 1998. The agnostic subtly probabilified. Analysis 58: 212–220.Analysis ↗