Regress Argument Reconstruction

Jan Willem Wieland Ghent University Hospital
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2012-11-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-012-9264-9
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (48)

  1. Armstrong, D.M. 1974. Infinite regress arguments and the problem of universals. Australasian Journal of Philo…
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  
  2. Beth, E.W. 1952. The prehistory of research into foundations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3…
    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science  
  3. Black, O. 1996. Infinite regress arguments and infinite regresses. Acta Analytica 16: 95–124.
    Acta Analytica
  4. Carroll, L. 1895. What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind 4: 278–280.
    Mind  
  5. Clark, R. 1988. Vicious infinite regress arguments. Philosophical Perspectives 2: 369–380.
    Philosophical Perspectives  
Show all 48 →
  1. Day, T.J. 1986. Infinite regress arguments. Some metaphysical and epistemological problems. PhD dissertation,…
  2. Day, T.J. 1987. Infinite regress arguments. Philosophical Papers 16: 155–164.
    Philosophical Papers  
  3. Fantle, J. 2011. Ryle’s regress defended. Philosophical Studies 156: 121–130.
    Philosophical Studies  
  4. Feldman, R. 1993. Reason and argument (2nd ed. 1999). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  5. Gettier, E.L. 1965. Review of Passmore’s Philosophical reasoning. Philosophical Review 2: 266–269.
    Philosophical Review  
  6. Gillett, C. 2003. Infinitism redux? A response to Klein. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66: 709–717.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  7. Gratton, C. 1997. What is an infinite regress argument? Informal Logic 18: 203–224.
    Informal Logic
  8. Infinite regress arguments
  9. Epistemology futures
  10. Jacquette, D. 1996. Adversus adversus regressum (against infinite regress objections). Journal of Speculative…
    Journal of Speculative Philosophy
  11. Johnson, O. 1978. Cartesian demonology revived. In Skepticism and cognitivism (ch. 3). Berkeley: CUP.
  12. Manifest rationality. A pragmatic theory of argument
  13. Johnstone H.W. Jr. 1996. The rejection of infinite postponement as a philosophical argument. Journal of Specu…
    Journal of Speculative Philosophy
  14. Juvenal 1st–2nd century CE. 1992. The Satires. (trans: Rudd, N.). Oxford: OUP.
  15. Klein, P.D. 1999. Human knowledge and the infinite regress of reasons. Philosophical Perspectives 13: 297–325.
    Philosophical Perspectives
  16. Klein, P.D. 2003. When infinite regresses are not vicious. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66: 718–729.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  17. Maurin, A.-S. 2007. Infinite regress: Virtue or vice? In Hommage à Wlodek, ed. T. Rønnow-Rasmussen et al., 1–…
  18. Nolan, D. 2001. What’s wrong with infinite regresses? Metaphilosophy 32: 523–538.
    Metaphilosophy  
  19. Dissensus and the search for common ground
  20. Passmore, J. 1961. Philosophical reasoning (2nd ed. 1970). New York: Scribner’s Sons.
  21. Peijnenburg, J. 2010. Ineffectual foundations. Mind 119: 1125–1133.
    Mind  
  22. ISSA 2010 proceedings
  23. Rankin, K.W. 1969. The duplicity of Plato’s third man. Mind 78: 178–197.
    Mind  
  24. Introduction to logic
  25. Infinite regress. The theory and history of a prominent mode of philosophical argumentation
  26. Rosenberg, J.F. 1978. Infinite regress. In The practice of philosophy, 69–73. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  27. Ruben, D.-H. 1990. Mill and Hempel on explanation. In Explaining explanation (ch. 4). London: Routledge.
  28. Russell, B. 1903. The objectionable and the innocent kind of endless regress. In The principles of mathematic…
  29. Ryle, G. 1945. Knowing how and knowing that. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46: 1–16.
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society  
  30. The concept of mind
  31. Principles of philosophical reasoning
  32. Schlesinger, G.N. 1983. Induction, infinite regresses, the uniformity of nature and the intelligibility of na…
  33. Sextus Empiricus 160–210 CE. 1996. Outlines of Pyrrhonism (trans: Mates, B.) In The skeptic way. Oxford: OUP.
  34. Sider, T. 1995. Sorensen on unknowable obligations. Utilitas 7: 273–279.
    Utilitas  
  35. Sorensen, R. 1995. Unknowable obligations. Utilitas 7: 247–271.
    Utilitas  
  36. Stanley, J., and T. Williamson. 2001. Knowing how. Journal of Philosophy 98: 411–444.
    Journal of Philosophy  
  37. Argument structure. A pragmatic theory
  38. Walton, D.N., and C.A. Reed. 2005. Argumentation schemes and enthymemes. Synthese 145: 339–370.
    Synthese  
  39. ISSA 2010 proceedings
  40. Wieland, J.W. ms. And so on. Two theories of regress arguments in philosophy. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.
  41. Wilson, N.L. 1959. Substances without substrata. Review of Metaphysics 12: 521–539.
    Review of Metaphysics
  42. Williams, J.N. 2008. Propositional knowledge and know-how. Synthese 165: 107–125.
    Synthese  
  43. Yalden-Thomson, D.C. 1964. Remarks about philosophical refutations. Monist 48: 501–512.
    Monist