Regress Argument Reconstruction

Jan Willem Wieland Ghent University Hospital
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2012-11-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-012-9264-9
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 24 works outside this index ↓
  1. Armstrong, D.M. 1974. Infinite regress arguments and the problem of universals. Australasian Journal of Philo…
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  
  2. Beth, E.W. 1952. The prehistory of research into foundations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3…
    British Journal for the Philosophy of Science  
  3. Carroll, L. 1895. What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind 4: 278–280.
    Mind  
  4. Clark, R. 1988. Vicious infinite regress arguments. Philosophical Perspectives 2: 369–380.
    Philosophical Perspectives  
  5. Day, T.J. 1987. Infinite regress arguments. Philosophical Papers 16: 155–164.
    Philosophical Papers  
  6. Fantle, J. 2011. Ryle’s regress defended. Philosophical Studies 156: 121–130.
    Philosophical Studies  
  7. Gettier, E.L. 1965. Review of Passmore’s Philosophical reasoning. Philosophical Review 2: 266–269.
    Philosophical Review  
  8. Gillett, C. 2003. Infinitism redux? A response to Klein. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66: 709–717.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  9. Epistemology futures
  10. Johnson, O. 1978. Cartesian demonology revived. In Skepticism and cognitivism (ch. 3). Berkeley: CUP.
  11. Juvenal 1st–2nd century CE. 1992. The Satires. (trans: Rudd, N.). Oxford: OUP.
  12. Klein, P.D. 2003. When infinite regresses are not vicious. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66: 718–729.
    Philosophy and Phenomenological Research  
  13. Nolan, D. 2001. What’s wrong with infinite regresses? Metaphilosophy 32: 523–538.
    Metaphilosophy  
  14. Peijnenburg, J. 2010. Ineffectual foundations. Mind 119: 1125–1133.
    Mind  
  15. Rankin, K.W. 1969. The duplicity of Plato’s third man. Mind 78: 178–197.
    Mind  
  16. Ruben, D.-H. 1990. Mill and Hempel on explanation. In Explaining explanation (ch. 4). London: Routledge.
  17. Ryle, G. 1945. Knowing how and knowing that. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46: 1–16.
    Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society  
  18. Sider, T. 1995. Sorensen on unknowable obligations. Utilitas 7: 273–279.
    Utilitas  
  19. Sorensen, R. 1995. Unknowable obligations. Utilitas 7: 247–271.
    Utilitas  
  20. Stanley, J., and T. Williamson. 2001. Knowing how. Journal of Philosophy 98: 411–444.
    Journal of Philosophy  
  21. Argument structure. A pragmatic theory
  22. Walton, D.N., and C.A. Reed. 2005. Argumentation schemes and enthymemes. Synthese 145: 339–370.
    Synthese  
  23. Williams, J.N. 2008. Propositional knowledge and know-how. Synthese 165: 107–125.
    Synthese  
  24. Yalden-Thomson, D.C. 1964. Remarks about philosophical refutations. Monist 48: 501–512.
    Monist