Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes

Douglas Walton University of Windsor ; Giovanni Sartor European University Institute
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2013-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-012-9262-y
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (3)

  1. Argumentation
  2. Argumentation
  3. Argumentation

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 18 works outside this index ↓
  1. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., and H. Prakken. 2010. Using argument schemes for hypothetical reasoning in law. Artifici…
    Artificial Intelligence and Law  
  2. Dung, P.M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmono- tonic reasoning, logi…
    Artificial Intelligence  
  3. Farley, A.M., and Freeman, K. 1995. Burden of proof in legal argumentation. In Proceedings of the 5th interna…
  4. Freeman, K., and A.M. Farley. 1996. A model of argumentation and its application to legal reasoning. Artifici…
    Artificial Intelligence and Law  
  5. The pleadings game: An artificial intelligence model of procedural justice
  6. Gordon, T.F., H. Prakken, and D. Walton. 2007. The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificia…
    Artificial Intelligence  
  7. Argumentation in artificial intelligence
  8. Gordon, T., and D. Walton. 2009b. Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In International conference on …
  9. McBurney, P., D. Hitchcock, and S. Parsons. 2007. The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue. International J…
    International Journal of Intelligent Systems  
  10. McBurney, P., and S. Parsons. 2001. Chance discovery using dialectical argumentation. In New frontiers in art…
  11. Mochales, R., and M.-F.Moens. 2009. Argumentation mining: The detection, classification and structure of argu…
  12. Mochales, R., and M.-F. Moens. 2011. Argumentation mining. Artificial Intelligence and Law 19(1): 1–22.
    Artificial Intelligence and Law  
  13. The nature of rationality
  14. Cognitive carpentry
  15. Sunstein, C.R., and A. Vermeule. 2003. Interpretation and institutions. Michigan Law Review 101: 885.
    Michigan Law Review  
  16. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse
  17. Walton, D., C. Reed and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Wooldridge, M. 2000. Reasoning about rational agents. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.