Argumentation May 2012

“People Who Argue Ad Hominem Are Jerks” and Other Self-Fulfilling Fallacies

Michael Veber East Carolina University
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2012-05-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-011-9230-y
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (14)

  1. L BonJour (1998)
    In defense of pure reason
  2. L Carroll (1894)
    Carroll, L. 1894. What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind 4: 278–280.
    Mind
  3. L Castagnoli (2010)
    Ancient self-refutation: The logic and history of the self-refutation argument from democ…
  4. R Fumerton (1995)
    Meta-epistemology and skepticism
     ↗
  5. CL Hamblin (1975)
    Hamblin, C.L. 1975. Saccherian arguments and the self-application of logic. Australasian Journal of Philosoph…
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
Show all 14 →
  1. D Jacquette (1996)
    Jacquette, D. 1996. The validity paradox in Modal S5. Synthese 109: 47–62.
    Synthese  ↗
  2. J Keynes (1921)
    A treatise on probability
  3. D Lewis (1971)
    Lewis, D. 1971. Immodest inductive methods. Philosophy of Science 38: 54–63.
    Philosophy of Science  ↗
  4. G Nuchelmans (1992)
    Nuchelmans, G. 1992. A 17th century debate on the ‘Consequentia Mirabilis’. History and Philosophy of Logic 1…
    History and Philosophy of Logic  ↗
  5. D Parfit (1984)
    Reasons and persons
  6. R Robinson (1971)
    Robinson, R. 1971. Begging the question. Analysis 31: 113–117.
    Analysis  ↗
  7. R Sorensen (1991)
    Sorensen, R. 1991. P, therefore P without circularity. The Journal of Philosophy 88: 245–266.
    The Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  8. R Sorensen (1996)
    Sorensen, R. 1996. Unbeggable questions. Analysis 56: 51–55.
    Analysis  ↗
  9. D Walton (1998)
    Ad hominem arguments
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →