Experts in Dialogue: An Introduction

Gábor Kutrovátz Eötvös Loránd University ; Gábor Á. Zemplén Budapest University of Technology and Economics

Abstract

Different approaches to expertise and argumentation are discussed. After introducing the problem of expertise and its present day significance in a historical context, various connections with the study of arguments are highlighted. The need for and potential of argumentation analysis to contribute to existing research in social epistemology, science studies, and cognitive science, is discussed, touching on the problems of reasoning and argumentation, embodiment, tacit knowledge, expert context versus public context, expert disagreement, persuasion versus justification, and argument analysis as meta-expertise. As the arguments used by experts constitute a boundary object, we presume that a dialogue format is suitable to address central problems of the special issue “Rethinking Arguments from Experts”.

Journal
Argumentation
Published
2011-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-011-9220-0
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
OA PDF Hybrid
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. Collins, H., and R. Evans. 2002. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Soci…
    Social Studies of Science  
  2. Rethinking expertise
  3. Genesis and development of a scientific fact
  4. Gieryn, T.F. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in pr…
    American Sociological Review  
  5. Kant, I. 2000. Critique of the power of judgment (trans: Guyer, P., and Matthews, E.). Cambridge: Cambridge U…
  6. Selinger, E., H. Dreyfus, and H. Collins. 2007. Interactional expertise and embodiment. Studies in the Histor…
    Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science  
  7. The one culture? A conversation about science
  8. Star, S.L., and J.R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs an…
    Social Studies of Science  
  9. Suppe, F. 1998. The structure of a scientific paper. Philosophy of Science 65(3): 381–405.
    Philosophy of Science