The Use of the Script Concept in Argumentation Theory

Paula Olmos Universidad Carlos III de Madrid ; Luis Vega National University of Distance Education
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2011-11-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-011-9212-0
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., and Suthers, D. (eds.) (2003). Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in compute…
  2. Abelson, R.P. 1981. Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist 36(7): 715–729.
    American Psychologist  
  3. Readings in argumentation
  4. Pennington, N., and R. Hastie. 1986. Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality a…
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology  
  5. Pennington, N., and R. Hastie. 1988. Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgme…
    Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition  
  6. Rouse, J. 2007. Social practices and normativity. Philosophy of The Social Sciences 37(1): 46–56.
    Philosophy of The Social Sciences  
  7. Rhetorical argumentation. Principles of theory and practice
  8. Walton, D. 2001. Enthymemes, common knowledge, and plausible inference. Philosophy and Rhetoric 34(2): 93–112.
    Philosophy and Rhetoric  
  9. Walton, D. 2008. The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory. Journal of Applied Logic 6: 361–379.
    Journal of Applied Logic  
  10. Weinberger, A., B. Ertl, F. Fischer, and H. Mandl. 2005. Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported c…
    Instructional Science  
  11. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., and Stegman, K. (2005b). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher edu…