The ‘Passes-For’ Fallacy and the Future of Critical Thinking — Pinakes

Argumentation Aug 2010

The ‘Passes-For’ Fallacy and the Future of Critical Thinking

William Goodwin Rowan University

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 2010-08-01
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-009-9170-y
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: argument
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (1)

Walton (1999)

Profiles of Dialogue for Evaluating Arguments from Ignorance

Argumentation

Also cites 2 works outside this index ↓

Haack, S. 1995/96. Science is neither sacred nor a confidence trick. Foundations of Science 3: 323–335.

↗
Kant, I. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, ed. P. Guyer and A. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network → Build reading path →