Perelman, ad Hominem Argument, and Rhetorical Ethos

Michael Leff University of Memphis
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2009-08-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-009-9150-2
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

References (16)

  1. Amossy, Ruth. 1999. “The Argument ad hominem in an Interactional Perspective”, Proceedings of the Fourth Inte…
  2. Amossy, Ruth. 2001. Ethos at the crossroads of disciplines: rhetoric, pragmatics, sociology. Poetics Today 22…
    Poetics Today  
  3. Rhetoric reclaimed: aristotle and the liberal arts tradition
  4. Brinton, Alan. 1985. A rhetorical view of ad hominem. Australian Journal of Philosophy 63: 50–63.
    Australian Journal of Philosophy  
  5. Brinton, Alan. 1986. Ethotic argument. History of Philosophy Quarterly 3: 255–258.
    History of Philosophy Quarterly
Show all 16 →
  1. Brinton, Alan. 1995. “The ad hominem”, Hansen and Pinto, 213–222.
  2. Rhetoric in the European tradtion
  3. Du Bois, W.E.B. 1989 [1903]. Souls of the black folk. New York: Bantam.
  4. Govier, Trudy. 1999. “Political speech, oliver sachs and the credibility concern,” The Philosophy of Argument…
  5. Fallacies
  6. Fallacies: classical and contemporary readings
  7. Leff, Michael and Robert Terrill. 1995. “The Polemicist as Artist: W.E.B. Dubois’ ‘Of Mr. Booker T. Washingto…
  8. Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrichts-Tyteca. 1969. The new rhetoric: a treatise on argumentation, trans. John…
  9. Van Eemeren, Frans & Rob Grootendurst. 1995a. Perelman and the fallacies. Philosophy and rhetoric 28: 122–133.
  10. Van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendurst. 1995b. “Argumentum ad hominem: a pragma-dialectical case,” Hanse…
  11. Ad hominem arguments