Evaluating Corroborative Evidence

Douglas Walton University of Windsor ; Chris Reed University of Dundee
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2008-11-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-008-9104-0
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Argumentation

References (12)

  1. Goddu, G.C. 2003. Against the “Ordinary Summing” test for convergence. Informal Logic 23(3): 215–236.
    Informal Logic
  2. Gordon, Thomas F., Henry Prakken, and Douglas Walton. 2007. The carneades model of argument and burden of pro…
    Artificial Intelligence  
  3. Redmayne, Mike. 2000. A corroboration approach to recovered memories’. Law Quarterly Review, 116, 147–155.
    Law Quarterly Review
  4. Argumentation machines
  5. Reed, C., and G. Rowe. 2004. Araucaria: software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. Inter…
Show all 12 →
  1. Reed, C., and D. Walton. 2005. Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent commu…
    Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems  
  2. Verheij, B. 2003. Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: an approach to legal logic. Artificia…
    Artificial Intelligence and Law  
  3. Walton, D. (1984). Logical dialogue-games and fallacies. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America. (Avai…
  4. Appeal to expert opinion
  5. Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law
  6. Walton, D., and T.F. Gordon. 2005. Critical questions in computational models of legal argument. In Internati…
  7. The principles of judicial proof as given by logic, psychology and general experience and…