What is Debate for? The Rationality of Tibetan Debates and the Role of Humor — Pinakes

Argumentation Mar 2008

What is Debate for? The Rationality of Tibetan Debates and the Role of Humor

Georges B. Dreyfus

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 2008-03-01
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-007-9079-2
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: argument
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

Waisanen et al. (2015)

What’s So Funny About Arguing with God? A Case for Playful Argumentation from J…

Argumentation

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 3 works outside this index ↓

G. Dreyfus (2003)

The sound of two hands clapping: the education of a Tibetan buddhist monk

↗
M. Kapstein (2000)

The assimilation of Buddhism

↗
F Sierskma (1964)

Sierskma, F. 1964. rTsod pa: The monachal dispute in Tibet. The Indo-Iranian Journal 8: 130–152.

The Indo-Iranian Journal ↗

CrossRef global citation count: 6 View in citation network → Build reading path →