Argumentation Sep 2007

Metadialogues: Krabbe’s Immanent Dialectic

Peter Houtlosser Faculty (United Kingdom) ; Jan Albert van Laar University of Groningen
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2007-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-007-9053-z
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (12)

  1. E. M. Barth (1982)
    From Axiom to Dialogue : A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation
     ↗
  2. F. H. Eemeren van (1984)
    Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion
     ↗
  3. F. H. Eemeren van (1992)
    Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies
  4. F. H. Eemeren van (2002)
    Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis
     ↗
  5. C. L. Hamblin (1970)
    Fallacies
Show all 12 →
  1. Krabbe, E. C. W.: 1996, Wat is eigenlijk een drogreden? [What Exactly is a Fallacy?] (inaugural address, Rijk…
  2. E. C. W. Krabbe (2003)
    Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation
     ↗
  3. P. Lorenzen (1978)
    Dialogische Logik
  4. J. Mackenzie (1990)
    Mackenzie J.: 1990, Four Dialogue Systems, Studia Logica 49, 567–583
    Studia Logica  ↗
  5. D. N. Walton (1995)
    A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy
  6. D. N. Walton (1998)
    The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument
     ↗
  7. D. N. Walton (1995)
    Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
CrossRef global citation count: 3 View in citation network → Build reading path →