Argumentation Sep 2007

Equivocation as a Point of Order

Jim Mackenzie University of Sydney
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2007-09-01
DOI
10.1007/s10503-007-9050-2
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 9 works outside this index ↓
  1. E. M. Barth (1982)
    From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation
     ↗
  2. Carroll L. [C. Dodgson]: 1895, ‹What the Tortoise Said to Achilles’, Mind n.s. 4, 278–280
     ↗
  3. Diogenes Laertius: 1966/1925, Vitae, Lives of Eminent Philosophers (tr. R. D. Hicks), William Heinemann, Lond…
     ↗
  4. H. G. Frankfurt (2005)
    On Bullshit
     ↗
  5. G. Harman (1984)
    Harman, G.: 1984, Logic and Reasoning, Synthèse 60, 107–128
    Synthèse  ↗
  6. Kripke, S.: 1972, ‹Naming and Necessity’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language,…
     ↗
  7. D. K. Lewis (1982)
    Lewis, D. K.: 1982, Logic for Equivocators, Noûs 16, 431–441
    Noûs  ↗
  8. J. Mackenzie (1979)
    Mackenzie, J.: 1979, How to Stop Talking to Tortoises, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20, 705–717
    Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic  ↗
  9. J. Mackenzie (1989)
    Mackenzie, J.: 1989, Reasoning and Logic, Synthèse 69, 99–117
    Synthèse  ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network → Build reading path →