Argumentation Mar 2004

Cogency and the Validation of Induction

G. C. Goddu University of Richmond
Journal
Argumentation
Published
2004-03-01
DOI
10.1023/b:argu.0000014869.24575.5b
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (11)

  1. J. Bigelow (1998)
    Bigelow, John and Robert Pargetter: 1998, 'No Logic of Cogency: Reply to Oakley', Australasian Journal of Phi…
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  2. R. Carnap (1950)
    Logical Foundations of Probability
  3. Goddu, G. C.: ‘The “Most Important and Fundamental” Distinction in Logic?’, Informal Logic, forthcoming.
  4. C. M. A. McCauliff (1982)
    McCauliff, C. M. A.: 1982, ‘Burdens of Proof: Degrees of Belief, Quanta of Evidence, or Constitutional Guaran…
    Vanderbilt Law Review
  5. I. T. Oakley (1998)
    Oakley, I. T.: 1998, ‘The Invalidation of Induction: A Reply to Pargetter and Bigelow’, Australasian Journal …
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
Show all 11 →
  1. R. Pargetter (1997)
    Pargetter, Robert and John Bigelow: 1997, ‘The Validation of Induction’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 7…
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  2. J. Pollock (1974)
    Knowledge and Justification
  3. R. Rudner (1953)
    Rudner, Richard: 1953, ‘The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgements’, Philosophy of Science 20, 1–6.
    Philosophy of Science  ↗
  4. Salmon, Wesley: 1998, ‘Scientific Explanation: How We Got from There to Here’, in E. D.
     ↗
  5. Klemke et al. (eds.), Introductory Readings in the Philosophy of Science, Prometheus Books, Amherst, pp. 241-263.
  6. W. Sellars (1970)
    Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →