Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.) (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis — Pinakes

Argumentation Jan 2004

Frans H. van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.) (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis

R. H. Johnson

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 2004-01-01
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-004-1076-0
CompPile
Open Access: Closed
Topics: rhetorical criticism argument
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (4) · 1 in this index

Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.
Johnson (2002)

Manifest Rationality Reconsidered: Reply to my Fellow Symposiasts

Argumentation
N. Rescher (1977)

Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge
J. Wenzel (1990)

Perspectives on Argumentation: Essays in honour of Wayne Brockreide

CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →