Regulating Disagreement, Constituting Participants: A Critique of Proceduralist Theories of Democracy

Darrin Hicks University of Denver ; Lenore Langsdorf Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1999-05-01
DOI
10.1023/a:1007773607213
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 11 works outside this index ↓
  1. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political
  2. Blaug, R.: 1996, ‘New Theories of Discursive Democracy: A User's Guide', Philosophy and Social Criticism 22, 49-80.
    Philosophy and Social Criticism  
  3. Castoriadis, C.: 1997, ‘Democracy as Procedure and Democracy as Regime', Constellations 4, 1-18.
    Constellations  
  4. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political
  5. Discursive Democracy
  6. Habermas, J.: 1994, ‘Three Normative Models of Democracy', Constellations 1, 1-10.
    Constellations  
  7. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
  8. Reed, R. R.: 1990, ‘Are Robert's Rules of Order Counterrevolutionary? Rhetoric and the Reconstruction of Port…
    Anthropological Quarterly  
  9. Sandel, M.: 1984, ‘The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self', Political Theory 12, 81-96.
    Political Theory  
  10. Sanders, L.: 1997, ‘Against Deliberation', Political Theory 25, 347-376.
    Political Theory  
  11. Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political