Argumentation as Rule-Justified Claims: Elements of a Conceptual Framework for the Critical Analysis of Argument — Pinakes

Argumentation Feb 1999

Argumentation as Rule-Justified Claims: Elements of a Conceptual Framework for the Critical Analysis of Argument

Michael Inbar Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Journal: Argumentation
Published: 1999-02-01
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007703608951
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: argument
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (2)

Woods (1988)

Ideals of rationality in dialogic

Argumentation
Blair et al. (1987)

Argumentation as dialectical

Argumentation

Also cites 4 works outside this index ↓

M. Black (1962)

Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy

↗
J. B. Freeman (1991)

Dialectics and the Macro Structure of Arguments: A Theory of Argument Structure

↗
E. E. Smith (1989)

Foundations of Cognitive Science

↗
J. D. Steinbruner (1974)

The Cybernetic Theory of Decision

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 2 View in citation network → Build reading path →