Argumentation Nov 1997

The Dilemma of Normativity: How to Interpret a Rational Reconstruction?

Paul van den Hoven Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1997-11-01
DOI
10.1023/a:1007795224452
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (10)

  1. E. M. Barth (1982)
    From Axiom to Dialogue
     ↗
  2. F. H. van Eemeren (1988)
    Argument and Critical Practice, Proceedings of the Fifth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation
  3. F. H. van Eemeren (1984)
    Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discuss…
     ↗
  4. Feteris, E: 1989, Discussieregels in het recht. Een pragma-dialectische analyse van het burgerlijk proces en …
  5. S. Fish (1989)
    Doing What Comes Naturally. Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and L…
Show all 10 →
  1. P. J. v. d. Hoven (1988)
    Hoven, P. J. van den: 1988, ‘Kelsen's Theory of Norms: Some Semiotic Remarks’, International Journal for the …
    International Journal for the Semiotics of Law
  2. P. J. v. d. Hoven (1990)
    Hoven, P. J. van den: 1990, ‘Clear Cases, Do They Exist?’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 7, 55–63.
    International Journal for the Semiotics of Law  ↗
  3. P. J. v. d. Hoven (1991)
    Hoven, P. J. van den: 1991, ‘De status van een drogredenleer’, Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 13, 145–154.
    Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing
  4. Soeteman, A.: 1985, ‘Recht, logica en Kelsen’, Rechtstheorie en rechtsfilosofie, 132–155.
  5. J. Wróblewski (1983)
    Meaning and Truth in Judicial Decision
CrossRef global citation count: 0 View in citation network → Build reading path →