Argumentation Nov 1995

Are ?is? to ?ought? deductions fallacious? on a Humean formal argument

J. L. A. Garcia
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1995-11-01
DOI
10.1007/bf00737776
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (18)

  1. (1989)
    Ethics in the History of Western Philosophy
  2. (1966)
    Hume: A Collection of Critical Essays
  3. Clark, R.: 1970, ?Concerning the Logic of Predicate Modifiers?,Nous 4.
     ↗
  4. G. Frege (1979)
    Posthumous Writings
  5. Garcia, J.L.A.: 1986, ?TheTunsollen, theSeinsollen, and theSoseinsollen?,American Philosophical Quarterly 23.
Show all 18 →
  1. P.T. Geach (1972)
    Logic Matters
  2. P.T. Geach (1980)
    Reference & Generality
  3. Geach, P.T.: 1982, ?Whatever Happened to Deontic Logic??,Philosophia 11.
     ↗
  4. (1981)
    New Studies in Deontic Logic
  5. R. Hilpinen (1971)
    Deontic Logic
  6. (1969)
    The Is-Ought Question
  7. Hume, D.: 1739,A Treatise of Human Nature.
     ↗
  8. G.E. Moore (1903)
    Principia Ethica
  9. Nelson, M.: 1993, ?Pigden on Is and Ought?, Paper presented at APA Central Division meeting in Chicago.
  10. C. Pigden (1992)
    Blackwell Companion to Ethics
  11. Sen, A.: 1966, ?Hume's Law and Hare's Rule?,Philosophy 61.
     ↗
  12. F. Sommers (1984)
    Logic of Natural Language
  13. Sullivan, T. and R. Panier.: Forthcoming, ?Identity, Predication, and Aquinas?,American Catholic Philosophica…
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →