Argumentation Nov 1995

And so indeed are perfect cheat

John Woods University of Lethbridge
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1995-11-01
DOI
10.1007/bf00737784
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 14 works outside this index ↓
  1. M.J. Blais (1987)
    Blais, M.J.: 1987, ?Epistemic TIT FOR TAT?,Journal of Philosophy LXXXIV, 363?375.
    Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  2. N. Cartwright (1983)
    How the Laws of Physics Lie
     ↗
  3. J. Hardwig (1985)
    Hardwig, J.: 1985, ?Epistemic Dependence?,Journal of Philosophy LXXXII, 335?349.
    Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  4. J. Hintikka (1989)
    Hintikka, J.: 1989, ?The Role of Logic in Argumentation?,The Monist 72, 3?24.
    The Monist  ↗
  5. Kaufman, W.: 1906. ?Uber die Konstitution des Elektrons?,Ann. Phys. 19.
     ↗
  6. I. Lakatos (1976)
    Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery
     ↗
  7. J. Locke (1690)
    An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
     ↗
  8. I. Nuniiluoto (1984)
    Is Science Progressive?
     ↗
  9. G. Oddie (1986)
    Likeness to Truth
     ↗
  10. W.V. Quine (1975)
    Quine, W.V.: 1975, ?Empirically Equivalent Systems of the World?,Erkenntnis 9, 313?328.
    Erkenntnis  ↗
  11. B.C. Fraassen van (1980)
    The Scientific Image
     ↗
  12. J. Woods (1987)
    Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline
     ↗
  13. J. Woods (1989)
    Woods, J.: 1989, ?The Maladroitness of Epistemic TIT FOR TAT?,Journal of Philosophy LXXXVI, 324?331.
    Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  14. J. Woods (1989)
    Fallacies: Selected Papers, 1972?1982
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 1 View in citation network → Build reading path →