Argumentation Nov 1995

Is it always fallacious to derive values from facts?

Mark T. Nelson University of Leeds
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1995-11-01
DOI
10.1007/bf00737777
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Hill (2009)
    Good News for the Logical Autonomy of Ethics
    Argumentation
  2. Sinnott-Armstrong (2000)
    From ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’ in Moral Epistemology
    Argumentation

References (15)

  1. R.F. Atkinson (1958)
    Atkinson, R.F. and A.C. Montefiore: 1958, ??Ought? and ?Is??,Philosophy 33, 29?49.
    Philosophy  ↗
  2. Stephen Barker (1974)
    The Elements of Logic
  3. Garcia, J.L.A.: ?Hume's Formal ?Is?-?Ought? Argument? ?, unpublished ms.
  4. G. Harman (1977)
    The Nature of Morality
  5. (1969)
    The Is/Ought Question
Show all 15 →
  1. David Hume (1978)
    A Treatise of Human Nature
  2. J.L. Mackie (1977)
    Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong
  3. G.J. Massey (1981)
    Massey, G.J.: 1981, ?The Fallacy Behind Fallacies?,Midwest Studies in Philosophy VI, 489?500.
    Midwest Studies in Philosophy  ↗
  4. Bernard Mayo (1986)
    The Philosophy of Right and Wrong
  5. Charles R. Pigden (1988)
    Pigden, Charles R.: 1988, ?Anscombe on ?Ought? ?,Philosophical Quarterly 38, 20?41.
    Philosophical Quarterly  ↗
  6. Charles R. Pigden (1989)
    Pigden, Charles R.: 1989, ?Logic and the Autonomy of Ethics?,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67, 127?151.
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  7. Charles R. Pigden (1990)
    Pigden, Charles R.: 1990, ?Geach on ?Good??,Philosophical Quarterly 40, 1?20.
    Philosophical Quarterly  ↗
  8. Charles R. Pigden (1991)
    A Companion to Ethics
  9. Pigden, Charles R.: 1991b, Personal correspondence (undated), circa March 1991.
  10. Searle, John R.: 1964, ?How to Derive ?Ought? from ?Is? ?,The Philosophical Review, reprinted in Hudson (1969…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 14 View in citation network → Build reading path →