Argumentation Nov 1995

Is it always fallacious to derive values from facts?

Mark T. Nelson University of Leeds
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1995-11-01
DOI
10.1007/bf00737777
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. Hill (2009)
    Good News for the Logical Autonomy of Ethics
    Argumentation
  2. Sinnott-Armstrong (2000)
    From ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’ in Moral Epistemology
    Argumentation

Cites in this index (0)

No references match articles in this index.

Also cites 6 works outside this index ↓
  1. R.F. Atkinson (1958)
    Atkinson, R.F. and A.C. Montefiore: 1958, ??Ought? and ?Is??,Philosophy 33, 29?49.
    Philosophy  ↗
  2. G.J. Massey (1981)
    Massey, G.J.: 1981, ?The Fallacy Behind Fallacies?,Midwest Studies in Philosophy VI, 489?500.
    Midwest Studies in Philosophy  ↗
  3. Charles R. Pigden (1988)
    Pigden, Charles R.: 1988, ?Anscombe on ?Ought? ?,Philosophical Quarterly 38, 20?41.
    Philosophical Quarterly  ↗
  4. Charles R. Pigden (1989)
    Pigden, Charles R.: 1989, ?Logic and the Autonomy of Ethics?,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67, 127?151.
    Australasian Journal of Philosophy  ↗
  5. Charles R. Pigden (1990)
    Pigden, Charles R.: 1990, ?Geach on ?Good??,Philosophical Quarterly 40, 1?20.
    Philosophical Quarterly  ↗
  6. Searle, John R.: 1964, ?How to Derive ?Ought? from ?Is? ?,The Philosophical Review, reprinted in Hudson (1969…
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 14 View in citation network → Build reading path →