Argumentation May 1992

Which of the fallacies are fallacies of relevance?

Douglas N. Walton
Journal
Argumentation
Published
1992-05-01
DOI
10.1007/bf00154328
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (1)

  1. Sandvik (1997)
    Reconstructing Interactive Argumentative Discourse
    Argumentation

References (11)

  1. Copi, Irving M. and Carl Cohen: 1990, Introduction to Logic, 8th ed., Collier Macmillan.
  2. Frans H. Eemeren van (1984)
    Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions
     ↗
  3. Richard L. Epstein (1990)
    The Semantic Foundations of Logic, Vol. 1, Propositional Logics
     ↗
  4. Charles L. Hamblin (1970)
    Fallacies
  5. John L. Pollock (1991)
    Pollock, John L.: 1991, ?A Theory of Defeasible Reasoning?, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 6, 33?54.
    International Journal of Intelligent Systems  ↗
Show all 11 →
  1. Raymond Reiter (1987)
    Reiter, Raymond: 1987, ?Nonmonotonic Reasoning?, Annual Review of Computer Science 2, 147?186.
    Annual Review of Computer Science  ↗
  2. Douglas N. Walton (1982)
    Topical Relevance in Argumentation
     ↗
  3. Douglas N. Walton (1989)
    Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation
  4. Douglas N. Walton (1990)
    Practical Reasoning: Goal-Driven, knowledge-Based, Action-Guiding Argumentation
  5. Douglas N. Walton (1991)
    Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation
  6. John Woods (1987)
    Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 4 View in citation network → Build reading path →