Using Team-Based Learning to Promote Engineering Students’ Performance and Self-Efficacy in a Technical Writing Class

Shenghua Zha; Shenghua Wu; Julie M. Estis

doi:10.1109/tpc.2021.3110619

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2021

Using Team-Based Learning to Promote Engineering Students’ Performance and Self-Efficacy in a Technical Writing Class

Shenghua Zha University of South Alabama ; Shenghua Wu University of South Alabama ; Julie M. Estis University of South Alabama

Abstract

<roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Introduction:</roman> Technical writing is an essential skill set for engineering students. Many studies have been conducted, but very few have used experimental or quasiexperimental design to identify an optimal instructional method in a technical writing class. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Situating the case:</roman> Team-based learning (TBL) is a well-structured learning method that prior studies have found to enhance students’ academic performance. TBL includes individual and collaborative learning activities from lower to higher cognitive levels. Peer leadership, as evidenced in other studies, uses appointed student leaders to promote equal and active group participation and shows a potential to solve the gender issue found in engineering class collaborations. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">About the case:</roman> In this case, we infused peer leadership in TBL in three technical writing sessions of an engineering lab class. Appointed student leaders were responsible for initiating and sustaining discussions, asking each group member's input, and seeking collective decisions on solutions. The other class used traditional TBL activities. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Methods/approach:</roman> Nonparametric analyses were conducted to compare students’ technical writing skills and self-efficacy, as well as gender differences in two classes. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Results/discussion:</roman> Students in the peer-led TBL class showed better technical writing skill retention than their counterparts in the traditional TBL class. The gender difference was identified in the traditional TBL class. However, we did not find any difference in students’ self-efficacy between the peer-led and traditional TBL sections, though both observed a significant improvement at the end. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Conclusions:</roman> We suggest studies with large sample sizes and equal distribution of female and male students.

Journal: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published: 2021-12-01
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2021.3110619
CompPile: Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access: Closed
Topics: writing pedagogy collaborative writing technical communication empirical research gender and writing
Export: BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (10)

Melonçon et al. (2020)

A Field-Wide Metasynthesis of Pedagogical Research in Technical and Professiona…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Weissbach et al. (2018)

Collaborating With Writing Centers on Interdisciplinary Peer Tutor Training to …

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Virtue (2017)

Increasing Student Interaction in Technical Writing Courses in Online Environments

Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
Bodnar et al. (2017)

Can Game-Based Learning Enhance Engineering Communication Skills?

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
White et al. (2016)

Are We “There” Yet? The Treatment of Gender and Feminism in Technical, Business…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

Show all 10 →

Tatzl et al. (2012)

The Development of a Project-Based Collaborative Technical Writing Model Founde…

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Dysart-Gale et al. (2010)

Improving Professional Writing for Lay Practitioners: A Rhetorical Approach

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Shen et al. (2008)

Learning Strategies in Online Collaborative Examinations

IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Wolfe et al. (2005)

The Computer Expert in Mixed-Gendered Collaborative Writing Groups

Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Ingram et al. (2002)

Gender and Modes of Collaboration in an Engineering Classroom

Journal of Business and Technical Communication

Also cites 30 works outside this index ↓

10.18260/1-2--23108

↗
10.18260/p.24250

↗
10.1007/s11165-019-09888-8

↗
10.1177/1469787417731201

↗
10.1097/JPA.0000000000000119

↗
10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015

↗
10.1007/s11409-014-9127-x

↗
10.2505/4/jcst14_044_02_31

↗
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00922.x

↗
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00737.x

↗
10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00375

↗
10.14426/jsaa.v4i1.143

↗
10.25891/6PGZ-J157

↗
10.2505/4/jcst18_048_02_40

↗
10.1080/08923647.2011.618314

↗
10.1002/bmb.21197

↗
welch (2010)

Poetry, visual design, and the how-to manual: Creativity in the teaching of technical writing

English J ↗
10.1080/1086296X.2010.525202

↗
10.3928/01484834-20111017-01

↗
10.1037/stl0000075

↗
10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.23

↗
10.1002/tl.330

↗
10.1080/03043797.2017.1367759

↗
10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014005111

↗
10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00023.x

↗
10.1021/ed800015t

↗
10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i12/3594

↗
10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00466.x

↗
10.12691/education-2-6-2

↗
10.1080/13803611.2014.895388

↗

CrossRef global citation count: 15 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Using Team-Based Learning to Promote Engineering Students’ Performance and Self-Efficacy in a Technical Writing Class

Abstract

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

Cites in this index (10)

Related Articles