Using Team-Based Learning to Promote Engineering Students’ Performance and Self-Efficacy in a Technical Writing Class

Shenghua Zha University of South Alabama ; Shenghua Wu University of South Alabama ; Julie M. Estis University of South Alabama

Abstract

<roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Introduction:</b></roman> Technical writing is an essential skill set for engineering students. Many studies have been conducted, but very few have used experimental or quasiexperimental design to identify an optimal instructional method in a technical writing class. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Situating the case:</b></roman> Team-based learning (TBL) is a well-structured learning method that prior studies have found to enhance students’ academic performance. TBL includes individual and collaborative learning activities from lower to higher cognitive levels. Peer leadership, as evidenced in other studies, uses appointed student leaders to promote equal and active group participation and shows a potential to solve the gender issue found in engineering class collaborations. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>About the case:</b></roman> In this case, we infused peer leadership in TBL in three technical writing sessions of an engineering lab class. Appointed student leaders were responsible for initiating and sustaining discussions, asking each group member's input, and seeking collective decisions on solutions. The other class used traditional TBL activities. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Methods/approach:</b></roman> Nonparametric analyses were conducted to compare students’ technical writing skills and self-efficacy, as well as gender differences in two classes. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Results/discussion:</b></roman> Students in the peer-led TBL class showed better technical writing skill retention than their counterparts in the traditional TBL class. The gender difference was identified in the traditional TBL class. However, we did not find any difference in students’ self-efficacy between the peer-led and traditional TBL sections, though both observed a significant improvement at the end. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Conclusions:</b></roman> We suggest studies with large sample sizes and equal distribution of female and male students.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2021-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2021.3110619
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

Cites in this index (10)

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  4. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  5. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Show all 10 →
  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  4. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  5. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Also cites 30 works outside this index ↓
  1. 10.18260/1-2--23108
  2. 10.18260/p.24250
  3. 10.1007/s11165-019-09888-8
  4. 10.1177/1469787417731201
  5. 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000119
  6. 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015
  7. 10.1007/s11409-014-9127-x
  8. 10.2505/4/jcst14_044_02_31
  9. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00922.x
  10. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00737.x
  11. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00375
  12. 10.14426/jsaa.v4i1.143
  13. 10.25891/6PGZ-J157
  14. 10.2505/4/jcst18_048_02_40
  15. 10.1080/08923647.2011.618314
  16. 10.1002/bmb.21197
  17. Poetry, visual design, and the how-to manual: Creativity in the teaching of technical writing
    English J  
  18. 10.1080/1086296X.2010.525202
  19. 10.3928/01484834-20111017-01
  20. 10.1037/stl0000075
  21. 10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.23
  22. 10.1002/tl.330
  23. 10.1080/03043797.2017.1367759
  24. 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014005111
  25. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00023.x
  26. 10.1021/ed800015t
  27. 10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i12/3594
  28. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00466.x
  29. 10.12691/education-2-6-2
  30. 10.1080/13803611.2014.895388