IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Dec 2021

Using Team-Based Learning to Promote Engineering Students’ Performance and Self-Efficacy in a Technical Writing Class

Shenghua Zha University of South Alabama ; Shenghua Wu University of South Alabama ; Julie M. Estis University of South Alabama

Abstract

<roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Introduction:</b></roman> Technical writing is an essential skill set for engineering students. Many studies have been conducted, but very few have used experimental or quasiexperimental design to identify an optimal instructional method in a technical writing class. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Situating the case:</b></roman> Team-based learning (TBL) is a well-structured learning method that prior studies have found to enhance students’ academic performance. TBL includes individual and collaborative learning activities from lower to higher cognitive levels. Peer leadership, as evidenced in other studies, uses appointed student leaders to promote equal and active group participation and shows a potential to solve the gender issue found in engineering class collaborations. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>About the case:</b></roman> In this case, we infused peer leadership in TBL in three technical writing sessions of an engineering lab class. Appointed student leaders were responsible for initiating and sustaining discussions, asking each group member's input, and seeking collective decisions on solutions. The other class used traditional TBL activities. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Methods/approach:</b></roman> Nonparametric analyses were conducted to compare students’ technical writing skills and self-efficacy, as well as gender differences in two classes. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Results/discussion:</b></roman> Students in the peer-led TBL class showed better technical writing skill retention than their counterparts in the traditional TBL class. The gender difference was identified in the traditional TBL class. However, we did not find any difference in students’ self-efficacy between the peer-led and traditional TBL sections, though both observed a significant improvement at the end. <roman xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><b>Conclusions:</b></roman> We suggest studies with large sample sizes and equal distribution of female and male students.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2021-12-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2021.3110619
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Topics
writing pedagogy collaborative writing technical communication empirical research gender and writing
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (55) · 10 in this index

  1. fink (2004)
    Beyond small groups: Harnessing the extraordinary power of learning teams
    Team-Based Learning A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching
  2. 10.18260/1-2--23108
     ↗
  3. 10.18260/p.24250
     ↗
  4. 10.1007/s11165-019-09888-8
     ↗
  5. 10.1177/1469787417731201
     ↗
Show all 55 →
  1. 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000119
     ↗
  2. 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015
     ↗
  3. 10.1007/s11409-014-9127-x
     ↗
  4. bandura (1997)
    Self-Efficacy The Exercise of Control
  5. bandura (1986)
    Social Foundations of Thought and Action A Social Cognitive Theory
  6. Virtue (2017)
    Increasing Student Interaction in Technical Writing Courses in Online Environments
    Business and Professional Communication Quarterly
  7. 10.2505/4/jcst14_044_02_31
     ↗
  8. haidet (2014)
    Analysis of the team-based learning literature: TBL comes of age
    J Excellence College Teaching
  9. gnanapragasam (2010)
    Evolution of technical writing in senior design&#x2014;A case history
    Adv Eng Educ
  10. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00922.x
     ↗
  11. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00737.x
     ↗
  12. 10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00375
     ↗
  13. 10.14426/jsaa.v4i1.143
     ↗
  14. everett (2017)
    Pre-defined roles and team performance for first year students
    International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research
  15. 10.25891/6PGZ-J157
     ↗
  16. 10.2505/4/jcst18_048_02_40
     ↗
  17. 10.1080/08923647.2011.618314
     ↗
  18. 10.1002/bmb.21197
     ↗
  19. corder (2014)
    A Step-By-Step Nonparametric Approach
  20. Dysart-Gale et al. (2010)
    Improving Professional Writing for Lay Practitioners: A Rhetorical Approach
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  21. welch (2010)
    Poetry, visual design, and the how-to manual: Creativity in the teaching of technical writing
    English J  ↗
  22. 10.1080/1086296X.2010.525202
     ↗
  23. hogg (2013)
    Probability and Statistical Inference
  24. 10.3928/01484834-20111017-01
     ↗
  25. 10.1037/stl0000075
     ↗
  26. 10.3352/jeehp.2015.12.23
     ↗
  27. 10.1002/tl.330
     ↗
  28. chowdhury (2019)
    Literature review: Exploring teamwork in engineering education
  29. 10.1080/03043797.2017.1367759
     ↗
  30. roy (0)
  31. Ingram et al. (2002)
    Gender and Modes of Collaboration in an Engineering Classroom: A Profile of Two…
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  32. Wolfe et al. (2005)
    The Computer Expert in Mixed-Gendered Collaborative Writing Groups
    Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  33. 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014005111
     ↗
  34. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00023.x
     ↗
  35. 10.1021/ed800015t
     ↗
  36. Weissbach et al. (2018)
    Collaborating With Writing Centers on Interdisciplinary Peer Tutor Training to …
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  37. Melonçon et al. (2020)
    A Field-Wide Metasynthesis of Pedagogical Research in Technical and Professiona…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  38. Tatzl et al. (2012)
    The Development of a Project-Based Collaborative Technical Writing Model Founde…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  39. Bodnar et al. (2017)
    Can Game-Based Learning Enhance Engineering Communication Skills?
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  40. Shen et al. (2008)
    Learning Strategies in Online Collaborative Examinations
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  41. 10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i12/3594
     ↗
  42. michaelsen (2004)
    Team-Based Learning A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching
  43. wu (2019)
    Peer-assisted learning in calculus II: Examining gender differences
  44. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00466.x
     ↗
  45. 10.12691/education-2-6-2
     ↗
  46. anderson (2001)
    A Taxonomy for Learning Teaching and Assessing A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
  47. cummings (1995)
    Gender and empowerment in the technical writing class
  48. White et al. (2016)
    Are We “There” Yet? The Treatment of Gender and Feminism in Technical, Business…
    Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  49. hartberg (2008)
    Development of student writing in biochemistry using calibrated peer review
    The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
  50. 10.1080/13803611.2014.895388
     ↗
CrossRef global citation count: 15 View in citation network → Build reading path →

Related Articles

  1. Pedagogy Apr 2024
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism feminist rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy creative writing teacher development collaborative writing assessment technical communication professional writing grammar and mechanics literacy studies gender and writing literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  2. The Peer Review Apr 2023
    Writing Center Theory and Research: A Review ↗
    Rebecca Babcock
    discourse analysis collaborative writing transfer threshold concepts writing centers technical communication archival research empirical research qualitative research quantitative research gender and writing book reviews
  3. Pedagogy Apr 2022
    Contributors ↗
    rhetorical criticism writing pedagogy creative writing writing across the curriculum teacher development collaborative writing assessment writing program administration technical communication professional writing digital rhetoric literacy studies gender and writing disability studies literary studies book reviews editorial matter
  4. Pedagogy Jan 2022
    Contributors ↗
    modern rhetorical theory rhetorical criticism genre theory discourse analysis african american rhetorics decolonial rhetorics first-year composition writing pedagogy basic writing writing across the curriculum graduate education teacher development argument collaborative writing transfer assessment portfolios writing program administration writing centers peer tutoring technical communication professional writing archival research digital rhetoric social media grammar and mechanics literacy studies race and writing gender and writing disability studies public rhetoric community literacy literary studies editorial matter
  5. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Mar 2021
    Hybrid Model for Multidisciplinary Collaborations for Technical Communication Education in Engineering ↗
    Christopher D. M. Andrews; Mehrube Mehrubeoglu; Charles Etheridge
    writing pedagogy writing across the curriculum collaborative writing writing centers technical communication professional writing empirical research