Abstract

Guidelines and models for procedural instructions can be supported by three types of research. Careful analytical studies of collections of instructions can help to identify, describe, and evaluate strategies that writers and designers apply. Empirical studies measure the effects of document variables on the performance of users, thus offering evidence, contraevidence, or refinements for existing guidelines. Theoretical studies, finally, aim to describe and explain the behavior of readers of instructions. To designers and writers, they provide a deeper insight in the underlying cognitive processes that determine success or failure of their work. This special issue offers research articles in all three categories.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2004-03-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2004.824294
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (2)

  1. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  2. Technical Communication Quarterly

References (19) · 3 in this index

  1. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  2. 10.1007/978-1-4684-1068-6_13
  3. 10.1007/BF00121082
  4. 10.2307/1167315
  5. 10.1201/9781482295375-8
Show all 19 →
  1. The Nurnberg Funnel: Designing Minimalist Instruction for Practical Computer Skill
  2. 10.7551/mitpress/4616.001.0001
  3. 10.1016/b978-0-12-223260-2.50014-1
  4. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
  5. The logical and rhetorical construction of procedural discourse
    Tech. Commun.
  6. 10.1037/h0037045
  7. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.1991.tb00293.x
  8. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  9. 10.1207/s15516709cog0803_3
  10. Handbook of Reading Research
  11. 10.1037/0278-7393.13.1.18
  12. 10.1016/0749-596X(87)90060-X
  13. 10.1075/tsl.11.05dix
  14. 10.1201/9780203302279