Literature reviews in student project reports

Abstract

Writing project reports is an important part of the engineering curriculum at Singapore universities. One important section of the formal report is the literature review. Most universities around the world provide guidelines on writing reviews, emphasizing that plagiarism is unethical. However, these guidelines do not offer explicit training on how to avoid plagiarism. In order to write academically acceptable reviews while avoiding copying from source materials, students face a major challenge and resort to employing various strategies to cope with the task. In this study, we examined the literature review sections of final year project reports to find out how engineering undergraduates in a Singapore university cope with writing reviews and to suggest ways in which they can extend their skills to improve their literature reviews.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2002-01-01
DOI
10.1109/tpc.2002.801637
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (19)

  1. 10.1016/0889-4906(86)90020-7
  2. 10.1017/CBO9781139524551.018
  3. Preparing & quoting references. Information services skills guide, Main Library Informati…
  4. 10.1016/s0889-4906(97)00054-9
  5. 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80116-7
Show all 19 →
  1. 10.4324/9781315840185
  2. 10.1016/0889-4906(88)90015-4
  3. 10.1016/1060-3743(93)90014-T
  4. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings
  5. Writing Up Research
  6. The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication
  7. 10.2307/358386
  8. Reviewing research in Applied Linguistics: Topics in language and literature—Occasional p…
  9. 10.1016/0346-251X(95)00020-K
  10. 10.1192/bjp.111.480.1111
  11. Can note-taking solve the plagiphrasing problem?
    EA J.
  12. 10.1075/swll.5
  13. 10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00029-4
  14. A comparison of the use of citations in Chinese and English academic discourse