IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication Jun 2000

Using learning styles in software documentation

S. Delanghe Emsworth Hospital

Abstract

The author suggests that minimal manuals don't appeal to everyone, and that these nonminimalists can be identified and catered to. He identifies different type of learners and how they learn. For example, dynamic learners would be impatient with direct instruction, would probably ignore the instruction, and just experiment. Focused learners are likely to be highly responsive to an authoritative coach. Contemplative learners insist that instructors provide evidence for their claims. Rigorous learners would respond well to thoroughly prepared instruction, but not to ad-hoc sessions. After instruction, they would want to be given a chance to work out the process by themselves. Finally, the author presents a list of techniques, based on learning style preferences, that might help writers engage their audience.

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
Published
2000-06-01
DOI
10.1109/47.843647
CompPile
Open Access
Closed
Export
BibTeX RIS

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (0)

No articles in this index cite this work.

References (9) · 1 in this index

  1. glasbeek (0)
    Improving the Quality of Tutorials Does Minimalism Always Help?
  2. carroll (1990)
    The Nurnberg Funnel Designing Minimalist Instruction for Practical Computer Skill
  3. newland (1990)
    Understanding designers' knowledge acquisition processes A potential for enhancing information transfer
  4. glasbeek (0)
    Summary of Leerstijlen van Computergebruikers
  5. margerison (1981)
    Advances in Management Education
Show all 9 →
  1. honey (1982)
    The Manual of Learning Styles
  2. Manning (1998)
    Minimalism beyond computer documentation
    IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication
  3. leary (1957)
    Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality
  4. kolb (1984)
    Experiential Learning Experience as the Source of Learning and Development
CrossRef global citation count: 5 View in citation network → Build reading path →